The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings & Torture

 

January 15th, 2009 - Israel Denies Using White Phosphorus in Gaza

News article from IRIN News

News article from BBC News

News article from the Times

Summary of White Phosphorus Weapons in Gaza

Israel Denies Using White Phosphorus in Gaza

 

From IRIN News

January 15, 2009

 

Tel Aviv - A huge fire was raging in the compound of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNWRA) after it was hit by Israeli tank shells on 15 January.

 

UNWRA spokesperson Chris Gunness told reporters they cannot put out the fire because it is white phosphorus. There were some 700 people in the compound in immediate danger, he said.

 

Gunness said three of the five shells to hit the complex were white phosphorus bombs.

 

On 13 January Brig-Gen Avi Benayahu, chief spokesman for the Israel Defense Force (IDF), said that in its assault on Gaza Israel was using weapons in accordance with international treaties and conventions. He denied Israel was using white phosphorus. ''I repeat Commander in Chief Ashkenazi’s words: The allegations of the IDF using WP [white phosphorus] are false.''

 

Palestinian medics in Gaza have reported treating patients for burns allegedly caused by white phosphorus.

 

Meanwhile, Israel’s defence minister has apologised to visiting UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, calling the attack on the UNRWA compound “a bitter mistake”.

 

International law

 

International law permits the use of white phosphorus in war as a “screen” to cover army movements but its use is highly controversial. White phosphorus can inflict agonising chemical burns.

 

The use of white phosphorus against civilians was banned in the 1980 Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects. (The convention was enforced in December 1983 and is an annex to the Geneva Conventions 1949). Israel signed the convention on 22 March 1995 but has not signed the relevant protocol III dealing with incendiary weapons such as white phosphorus.

 

Photographs

 

A spokesperson for Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), an Israeli NGO, told IRIN they had received photos of alleged phosphorus burns from news agencies working inside Gaza. These photos are being reviewed by experts in plastic surgery in Israel to determine whether they are indeed of phosphorus wounds.

 

On 13 January, in response to a query from parliamentarian Zehava Galon on the allegation that the IDF was using white phosphorus in Gaza, IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi said: “The IDF operates weapons in accordance with international law. We do not use phosphorus, only “smoke curtains” (smoke screens).''

 

The answer did not explain what “smoke curtains” are.

 

In an interview on Israeli TV Channel 1 on 12 January, Reserve Maj-Gen Yiftach Ron Tal said: ''Israel is using smoke screens that include phosphoric elements.''

 

Eyewitnesses on the Gaza border told IRIN they saw what seemed to be similar to what they know from their military service to be phosphorus smoke screens.

 

Adam Keller, a spokesperson for Gush Shalom, the Israeli peace bloc, told IRIN: “While using smoke screens containing phosphorus may be allowed by international law, it inflicts terrible injuries in heavily populated areas. The IDF might be acting within the law but it is causing grave injuries to the population in Gaza.''

 

Israel previously used white phosphorus during the second Lebanon war in 2006 and was criticised internationally for doing so.

 

External link: http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=82402


UN accuses Israel over phosphorus

 

From BBC News

January 15, 2009

 

The head of the UN aid agency in Gaza has accused the Israeli military of firing what was believed to be white phosphorus shells at its compound.

 

John Ging told the BBC that in spite of discussions with the Israeli liaison, "three rounds that emitted phosphorus" hit a corner of the Gaza City facility.

 

Israel's military said all weapons it used complied with international law.

 

Phosphorus shells are legal to use as a battlefield obscurant, but are banned from use where civilians may be harmed.

 

Human Rights Watch says it has observed "dozens and dozens" of white phosphorus shells being fired by Israel at the Gaza Strip - a heavily populated civilian area where the group says its use is prohibited.

 

Palestinian medical officials said they had treated large numbers of casualties with unusual burns that were extremely painful to treat and could be consistent with exposure to white phosphorus (WP).

 

The Israeli military has declined to comment on specific munitions used during the 20-day offensive, but said any of its weapons were used in compliance with international law.

 

There is no way independently to explain the contradiction between both sides' reports, as Israel has prevented international journalists from entering Gaza since its offensive began on 27 December.

 

‘Relentless bombardment’

 

In an interview with the BBC, Mr Ging, director of operations in Gaza for the UN Relief and Works Agency (Unrwa), said the area surrounding its compound had been under "relentless artillery and tank bombardment all night and all day".

 

Some rounds, Mr Ging said, had struck a part of the compound where about 700 residents of nearby blocks of flats were taking shelter. Three people were injured in the bombardment.

 

"Then an hour later, in spite of our protests and real-time discussions with the Israeli liaison, three rounds that emitted phosphorous struck the other corner of the compound," he added.

 

The compound is Unrwa's main distribution hub in Gaza and Mr Ging said the shells set alight part of a warehouse in which there were stored thousands of tonnes of food and medicine, and the workshop area.

 

The fires then threatened to engulf five fuel tankers, which had been due to be sent out that morning, but could not leave because it was too dangerous outside.

 

"When the fires broke out, five of our brave staff dashed down there and moved the trucks out of the area, so we avoided a massive explosion," he said.

 

Mr Ging told CNN the fire was very difficult to extinguish because the smoke from WP becomes toxic if water is used.

 

Following the incident, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon - in Israel to push for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip - expressed his "outrage" and demanded a full explanation from the Israeli government.

 

"The defence minister said to me it was a grave mistake and he took it very seriously. He assured me that extra attention will be paid to UN facilities and staff and this will not be repeated," Mr Ban said.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the compound had been targeted after militants had opened fire from there.

 

"It is absolutely true that we were attacked from that place, but the consequences are very sad and we apologise for it," he said. "I don't think it should have happened and I'm very sorry."

 

‘Indiscriminate’

 

White phosphorus sticks to human skin and will burn right through to the bone, causing death or leaving survivors with painful wounds which are slow to heal.

 

The international convention on the use of incendiary weapons says it should not be used where there is a possibility of hitting civilians. An Israeli military spokesman said it was investigating the reports, but reiterated earlier assurances about the legality of its weaponry.

 

White phosphorus is permitted on the battlefield to make smoke screens to allow troops to move undetected, and also to impede infrared anti-tank weapons.

 

But its use in the densely populated areas of central Gaza City would be "unlawful", as it dispersal would be indiscriminate and could put civilians at risk, says Human Rights Watch military analyst Marc Garlasco.

 

"The Israeli military may be using legal weapons, but it is using the weapons in an illegal manner," Mr Garlasco told the BBC News website.

 

He said he had observed dozens and dozens WP shells used by the Israeli army over Gaza since 27 December, both ground-burst shells and air-burst, scattering distinctive burning lumps of phosphorus which left white smoke trails.

 

"We are absolutely certain this is white phosphorus, this is the singular, unique visual signature of white phosphorus on the battlefield. Not only have I seen it for myself but I have checked with US artillery," Mr Garlasco added.

 

Mr Garlasco also examined a press photograph which showed a burning lump of matter in the UN compound. He said it "definitely appeared" to be WP, but that the photo was not detailed enough to say with complete certainty.

 

External link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7831424.stm


Spent shells prove Israeli use of white phosphorus, Gaza doctors say

 

By Sheera Frenkel

The Times

January 15, 2009

 

Remnants of an Israeli white phosphorus shell, identified by the marking on the outer casing - M825A1 - have been found in the village of Sheikh Ajilin in western Gaza.

 

Witnesses in Gaza said that the shell was fired on January 9 and was taken indoors as evidence. They recalled seeing thick smoke and smelling a strong odour in keeping with the garlic-like smell associated with white phosphorus.

 

Hebrew writing on the shell casing reads “exploding smoke” - the term the Israeli army uses for white phosphorus. Doctors who examined the shell said that it appeared to include phosphorus residue.

 

Residents said that they suffered burns on their feet when they walked where the shelling had taken place.

 

A suspected phosphorus victim was taken from Gaza across the border into Egypt yesterday. Abdul Rahman Shaer, 16, was transferred to an Egyptian hospital from Rafah. He was suffering from severe chemical burns to his face and body. Paramedics from Gaza said that doctors at the hospital were sure the chemical agent was phosphorus.

 

The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) reiterated that they would not comment on specific weaponry being used in Gaza but added that any ammunition used by the IDF was “within the scope of international law”.

 

The Geneva Treaty of 1980 stipulates that white phosphorus should not be used as a weapon of war in civilian areas but there is no blanket ban under international law on its use as a smokescreen or for illumination.

 

Human Rights organisations have criticised the use of it in Gaza, saying that it was impossible to avoid exposing civilians to the chemical because Gaza is densely populated.

 

Israeli security officials said that Palestinians were using phosphorus weapons of their own and that a phosphorus bomb exploded in the western Negev region of Israel yesterday. It was among 14 rockets fired from Gaza into Israel. No one was injured in the attacks.

 

Human Rights Watch renewed its appeal to Israel to refrain from using white phosphorus shells. “This is a chemical compound that burns structures and burns people,” Kenneth Roth, the executive director of the Washington-based organisation, said. “It should not be used in populated areas.”

 

Mr Roth said that Human Rights Watch had experts in the region who had witnessed the use of phosphorus shells.

 

“Even if Israel might have some minor chemical variation of white phosphorus so that the thing they're using has a new name, the effect is absolutely the same,” he said.

 

He agreed there was no ban on using the chemical to protect troops. “But it should not be used in civilian areas because there's a parallel duty to take all conceivable precautions to protect the lives of non-combatants,” Mr Roth said.

 

External link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5519433.ece

Back to news & media - year 2009

Back to main archive

Back to main index