The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings & Torture

 

April 22nd, 2009 - Israel Denies Violating International Law in Gaza

News article from the Associated Press

News article from the New York Times

News article from the Christian Science Monitor

News article from the Times

Summary of White Phosphorus Weapons in Gaza

Israel Denies Violating International Law in Gaza

 

By Aron Heller

Associated Press

April 22, 2009

 

Tel Aviv, Israel - An internal Israeli investigation into the Gaza war released Wednesday found no violations of international law, outraging human rights groups that allege war crimes were committed.

 

Rights activists renewed their call for an independent inquiry, with Human Rights Watch denouncing it as "an insult" to Gaza civilians and proof the military would not objectively examine its conduct.

 

In Norway on Wednesday, a group of lawyers filed a complaint accusing 10 Israelis, including former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, of war crimes. The Norwegian government must now determine whether there are grounds for charges or a police investigation.

 

Israel launched its three-week offensive on Dec. 27 to try to halt daily rocket attacks from Gaza that had terrorized southern Israel for years. The use of air and ground power against Gaza's Islamic Hamas rulers was unprecedented in Israel's war against Palestinian militants, who operate within residential areas.

 

Palestinians say more than 1,400 Gazans were killed, including 926 civilians. Israel says 1,166 Palestinians were killed, including 709 Hamas and Islamic Jihad militants, 295 civilians and 162 men whose identities could not be confirmed.

 

The military conducted five separate investigations into some of its most controversial actions during the war, including attacks on and near U.N. and international facilities, shooting at medical workers and facilities, the widespread destruction of Palestinian homes, and the use in densely populated Gaza of white phosphorus, a chemical agent that causes horrific burns.

 

The investigations uncovered "a very small number of incidents" in which intelligence or operational errors took place during the fighting, the military said. One included an airstrike that killed 21 members of the same family.

 

"These unfortunate incidents were unavoidable and occur in all combat situations, in particular of the type that Hamas forced on the (Israeli military), by choosing to fight from within the civilian population," the military concluded in a report issued at the briefing.

 

Deputy chief of staff Maj. Gen. Dan Harel said the military maintained "a high professional and ethical level" while facing an enemy that took cover among uninvolved civilians.

 

Rights activists were outraged.

 

"This statement is an insult to the civilians in Gaza who needlessly died and an embarrassment to (Israel Defense Forces) members who take military justice seriously," Human Rights Watch said in a statement from New York. "It shows that the IDF leadership will not objectively monitor itself."

 

Israeli rights activists called for an independent inquiry "that would look at the whole range of violations the army is incapable of looking at."

 

"It shows how important it is that Israel cooperate with the fact-finding mission of Goldstone that would look at violations,' said B'Tselem spokeswoman Sarit Michaeli, speaking for various Israeli human rights groups that have made this demand in the past.

 

Richard Goldstone, a former U.N. chief prosecutor for war crimes, recently was appointed to head a U.N. investigation into atrocities allegedly committed by both sides during the war.

 

Israel has not said whether it would cooperate with his investigation.

 

"If they aren't guilty, they should allow entry to international investigators from the U.N.," Hamas adviser Ahmed Youssef said after the military released its findings.

 

Among the questions being raised is whether Israel used disproportionate force and failed to protect civilians.

 

In one case, Israeli artillery fire hit near a U.N. school where hundreds of Gazans had sought refuge, killing 42 people. Israeli said troops responded to fire from militants nearby.

 

Israel also has been criticized for using white phosphorus weapons, which can be legitimately used in war. But rights activists have said its use over populated areas can indiscriminately burn civilians and constitute a war crime.

 

Israel says its military took great care to avoid harming civilians in Gaza, preceding some airstrikes with leaflets or phone calls warning civilians to flee - a contention confirmed by Gaza residents.

 

In Jerusalem, the U.N.'s top Mideast envoy, Robert Serry, toured several Palestinian areas where Israel had demolished or threatened to demolish homes. He expressed concern about a rising number of demolitions recently and urged Israel to halt the practice.

 

Serry visited the ruins of a home that had been demolished hours earlier. The demolition left the Hdaidoun family of seven, including five children, homeless. He said the family's distress was "pretty shocking."

 

Also Wednesday, the grass-roots OneVoice Movement released a poll showing the vast majority of Israelis and Palestinians are willing to live alongside each other peacefully in separate states.

 

Results indicate that 74 percent of Palestinians and 78 percent of Israelis are willing to accept a two-state solution. The group said the poll counters fears that the two-state solution is losing support in Israel and the Palestinian territories.

 

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press.

 

External link: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ioi_0jtO9RjMwPNRoXNCndRPRq3gD97NKHL02


Israel Says Its Actions in Gaza War Were Lawful

 

By Isabel Kershner

New York Times

April 22, 2009

 

Jerusalem - The Israeli military on Wednesday presented the conclusions of several internal investigations into its conduct during the recent war in Gaza and stated that it operated in accordance with international law throughout the fighting, countering widespread international criticism over its actions and continuing accusations of possible war crimes.

 

The military said it had “maintained a high professional and moral level” during the 22-day war that ended Jan. 18, though it faced “an enemy that aimed to terrorize Israeli civilians whilst taking cover” among Palestinian civilians and “using them as human shields.”

 

Israel mounted its campaign against Hamas, the Islamic militant group ruling Gaza, with the stated purpose of preventing rocket fire on southern Israel from the densely populated Palestinian territory. But the offensive sparked international outrage and condemnation as the Palestinian death toll grew, as United Nations facilities and medical teams came under fire and as allegations emerged of improper use of white phosphorous.

 

Earlier this month, the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council appointed an internationally renowned judge, Richard J. Goldstone, to lead a high-level mission to investigate allegations of war crimes during the Gaza war.

 

Though Mr. Goldstone, a former judge of the South African Constitutional Court and the former United Nations chief prosecutor for war crimes in Yugoslavia and Rwanda, has said he will investigate possible violations by both Israel and Hamas, officials in Jerusalem have said it is highly unlikely that Israel will cooperate with the mission.

 

Gaza health officials said more than 1,300 Palestinians died during the Gaza fighting, but Israel disputes Palestinian claims that most of them were non-combatants. By the Israeli military’s count, 1,166 people were killed of whom 295 were noncombatants, 709 were what it called Hamas terror operatives and 162 were men whose affiliations remained unidentified.

 

The Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza put the number of dead at 1,417, of whom it said 926 were civilians and 236 combatants. Israel says that about 400 Gazans die of natural causes every month, possibly accounting for the discrepancy in numbers.

 

Thirteen Israelis were killed during the fighting, among them 10 soldiers and three civilians.

 

Gen. Dan Harel, the Israeli military’s deputy chief of staff, told reporters on Wednesday that the army “discovered a small number of mistakes, not many, among the dozens of incidents we investigated, and we have already examined them and learned lessons from them.”

 

General Harel added that the army had “not found a single case of an Israeli soldier deliberately hurting innocent Palestinian civilians, whether from the land, air or sea.” If any such case was discovered, he said, it would be treated with the full severity of the law.

 

Describing the mistakes as “unfortunate” and ascribing them to “intelligence or operational errors,” the military said such incidents “were unavoidable and occur in all combat situations, in particular of the type which Hamas forced” on the army “by choosing to fight from within the civilian population.”

 

Three separate investigations whose conclusions were presented on Wednesday dealt with specific events that were brought to the army’s attention by the news media or other means. Two others examined general subjects, namely the use of weapons containing phosphorous and the destruction of infrastructure and buildings by ground forces.

 

In one now notorious case where Israeli shells killed up to 40 Palestinians outside a United Nations school in the Jabaliya refugee camp, north of Gaza City, on Jan. 6, the soldiers were responding, according to the military, to mortar shells fired by militants in the vicinity of the school. Israel says that between 12 and 17 Palestinians were killed, five of whom were militants.

 

Soon after the shelling, however, Palestinian hospital officials in the Jabaliya area told a reporter that 40 people had been killed, among them 10 children and 5 women. At a mass funeral in Jabaliya the next day, a reporter was unable to count the bodies in the press of the mourning crowd, but described seeing the bodies of the children laid out in a long row on the ground. One of the mourners, Huda Deed, said she had lost nine members of her extended family, ages 3 to 25.

 

Another case investigated by the military involved the Daia family, 21 of whom were killed when their home, in the Zeitoun neighborhood of Gaza City, was hit in an Israeli strike on Jan. 6. Expressing regret for the incident, a senior military official said the army had intended hitting the house next door, which was a weapons storage facility; the Daia home was struck because of an “operational error.”

 

Israel has already come under heavy criticism for its use of white phosphorous in heavily populated Gaza. White phosphorus is a standard, legal weapon in armies, long used as a way to light up an area or to create a thick white smoke screen to obscure troop movements. But it can cause horrific burns, so using it against civilians, or in an area where many civilians are likely to be affected, can be a violation of international law.

 

Last month, Human Rights Watch issued a report citing six cases of improper use ofwhite phosphorus by Israel and calling them evidence of war crimes.

 

The military said it used two types of munitions containing white phosphorous, incendiary shells for marking and range-finding, which it said were used in limited quantities, and non-incendiary types of munitions used to create smoke screens. But officials said that both types were used in open areas only, in accordance with the limitations of international law.

 

The military noted that these investigations, conducted by officers with the rank of colonel, are not a replacement for the central operational army investigation of the entire campaign, which will be concluded by June.

 

The findings are not exhaustive. For example, the case of the Samouni family, some 30 of whose members were killed when their home in Zeitoun was hit on Jan. 5, remains unresolved. Maj. Avital Leibovich, a military spokeswoman, said the case was still being examined, and that it was not yet clear if the Samounis were killed by Israeli fire.

 

Israeli and international human rights groups rejected the Israeli military’s internal investigations as inadequate. Human Rights Watch called Wednesday’s statement by the military “an insult to the civilians in Gaza who needlessly died.” The army leadership, the group said, is “apparently not interested, willing, or able to monitor itself.”

 

External link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/world/middleeast/23gaza.html


Israeli army admits ‘isolated’ mistakes in Gaza

At a briefing Wednesday, a top officer described the findings of an internal inquiry, insisting Israel acted in accord with international law.

 

By Joshua Mitnick

The Christian Science Monitor

April 22, 2009

 

Tel Aviv - Israel's second-ranking military officer admitted Wednesday the army made mistakes that caused civilian deaths during the January Gaza war against Hamas, but he reiterated the Army's assertion that it did not violate international conventions on warfare.

 

Deputy Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Dan Harel said the Army will forward to Israel's military prosecutor and the attorney general the findings of an internal inquiry into accusations of illegal use of white phosphorous munitions, targeting humanitarian and civilian infrastructure.

 

"We found a very small amount of cases where we had operational or intelligence mistakes during the fighting," General Harel told journalists attending a briefing at the military's national headquarters. Still, Harel insisted, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) "conducted itself in the Cast Lead operation under international rules of law."

 

The briefing was an attempt to address charges at home and abroad of war crimes. Palestinians and human rights groups allege that the Army used disproportionate force in Gaza's densely packed residential areas that left more than 1,000 Palestinians dead, thousands more injured, and a swath of physical destruction.

 

The UN is investigating some of the charges, and the International Court of Justice is mulling its own inquiry. Human rights lawyers abroad have said they are planning to introduce lawsuits in European domestic courts willing to exercise principles of universal jurisdiction over accusations of war crimes in third-party countries.

 

On Wednesday, six Norwegian lawyers said they were planning to bring charges of war crimes against former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and other top officials, according to Agence France-Presse.

 

Army: We hit 1,400 Hamas targets

 

The Army said the deadliest error occurred Jan. 6 when Israeli soldiers killed 21 civilians who were taking cover in a house. The soldiers mistook the house for a nearby weapons storehouse.

 

Harel said the mix-up was due to an "intelligence mistake," but insisted that the Army successfully identified some 1,400 Hamas other targets during the war. In a reiteration of the military's defense of the civilian toll at the time of the fighting, Harel said Hamas was to blame for the destruction for booby-trapping residences and hunkering down near hospitals.

 

Israeli human rights organizations disputed the findings and called on the government to cooperate with independent human rights groups seeking to investigate the war. Military commentators have reported that the Army used overwhelming firepower inside Gaza for fear that a high casualty rate among its own soldiers would sap support among the Israeli public for the offensive.

 

"The doctrine of using extreme armed force was a doctrine set from above," says Sarit Michaeli, the spokeswoman of the human rights watchdog B'tselem. She adds that the military inquiry "is not the correct forum to conduct this investigation" into accountability.

 

Inquiries at home and abroad

 

Israel so far has refused to cooperate with a UN fact-finding team to investigate the war on both sides of the Israel-Gaza divide.

 

The Army denied accusations that it illegally used artillery shells with the incendiary white phosphorous agent against civilian areas. While saying it launched white phosphorous shells into open areas to target its fire, the military also acknowledged using smoke bombs that scattered fragments with small amounts of phosphorous over civilian areas. The munitions were used to obscure forces and didn't endanger civilians.

 

"I cannot buy it after being on the receiving end," said Eyad Sarraj, the director of the Gaza Community Mental Health Program. "I felt it. I sniffed the white phosphorous in my house. My children almost suffocated by it."

 

Human rights and international news groups have documented medical experts who assert that numerous Gazans were injured by white phosphorous burns.

 

During the war, accusations that Israel used excessive force against third-party civilians in Gaza instead of Hamas militants helped erode the initial understanding internationally of Israel's opening response to continued rocket fire from the Gaza Strip at southern Israeli towns and cities.

 

Last month, Israel's military prosecutor opened and then closed an inquiry into the testimony of several war veterans who claimed that soldiers had fired indiscriminately on noncombatants. The stories were dismissed by the Army as "hearsay."

 

The Army says it is investigating additional allegations of misconduct, but it's unclear whether the military prosecutor will open its own inquiry or even press charges.

 

Israel said it destroyed 636 residential buildings over the course of the war. Palestinians say about 4,000 structures were destroyed and some $2 billion in damage was caused.

 

The Army also reiterated that about 1,100 Gazans were killed, about 70 percent of whom were identified as Hamas operatives. Palestinians say the number was about 1,400 and that only 30 percent of the casualties were militants.

 

Israel also was accused of targeting UN installations and humanitarian workers, though some of those claims were dropped.

 

Israel still is grappling with the international fallout from the war. The Guardian newspaper reported Wednesday that Britain will review all weapons shipments to Israel following the war.

 

External link: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0422/p06s10-wome.html


Israel backs down over white phosphorus

 

By Sheera Frenkel

The Times

April 22, 2009

 

Israeli troops stopped using white phosphorus shells in Gaza this year after The Times published evidence that they were injuring civilians.

 

In its first explicit admission, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said that “media buzz” had forced the army to withdraw the shells from its arsenal on January 7 - the day that The Times obtained photographs of stockpiles and two days after the newspaper had exposed the effect of white phosphorus on the population of Gaza.

 

Phosphorus bombs may be used to create smokescreens but their use as weapons of war in civilian areas is banned by the Geneva Conventions. They cause severe burns that can penetrate to the bone.

 

An IDF briefing yesterday after an inquiry into the three-week Gaza offensive disclosed that two different munitions containing white phosphorus had been used. Mortar shells fired by ground forces and 76mm rounds fired from naval vessels both contained phosphorus as an active ingredient.

 

Until now the IDF has denied the Times accounts. On January 7 a military spokeman said that the shells in question had “no explosives and no white phosphorus”. Yet it was clear from yesterday's briefing by Major-General Dan Harel, the IDF Deputy Chief of Staff, that commanders were concerned by the controversy. “Since this was a big buzz in the media, we issued an order 7 Jan '09 to stop using white phosphorus shells,” he said, adding: “These shells were used only to create smokescreens, in keeping with international law.”

 

Even after the January 7 order the IDF continued to deploy less dangerous “smoke shells”, which contain felt soaked in phosphorus.

 

Israel launched Operation Cast Lead on December 27 in an effort to halt daily rocket attacks by Hamas militants from Gaza that were terrorising residents in southern Israel.

 

Yesterday's briefing was based on five IDF investigations into alleged violations committed by the military during the operation, in which more than a thousand Palestinians were killed. An Israeli official said that inquiries “revealed a very small number of incidents in which intelligence or operational errors took place”. By and large, the army had “maintained a high professional and moral level”.

 

The incidents included an attack that killed 21 people when forces targeted a home rather than a nearby weapon storage facility. “These unfortunate incidents are unavoidable and occur in all combat situations, in particular of the type which Hamas forced on the IDF by choosing to fight from within the civilian population,” the official said.

 

Human Rights Watch said: “We consider the IDF investigations a cover-up for serious violations of international law. Hamas also seriously violated the laws of war.”

 

Timetable of allegations and rebuttals

 

January 5 - The Times reports tell-tale smoke above Gaza. An Israeli military official says: “We categorically deny the use of white phosphorus.”

 

January 8 - The Times runs pictures of white phosphorus shells stockpiles. Major Avital Leibovich, a military spokesman, says: “This is what we call a quiet shell - it has no explosives and no white phosphorus. It is not for killing people.”

 

January 12 - The Times finds more than 50 phosphorus burns victims in hospital

 

January 14 - Gabi Ashkenazi, Israel Defence Forces Chief of Staff, says: “The IDF acts only in accordance with international law and does not use white phosphorus .”

 

January 16 - UN Relief and Works Agency HQ hit with phosphorus munitions

 

January 21 - Major Leibovich admits use of white phosphorus “according to international law”. Major- General Amir Eshel, the army's head of strategic planning, says: “It is the most non-lethal kind of weapon. I don't see any issue with that.”

 

January 23 - Israel launches investigation into white phosphorus munitions: “Some practices could be illegal. The IDF is holding an investigation concerning one specific unit and one incident.”

 

April 22 - Israeli military official tells The Times that a “media buzz” led to the order to stop using white phosphorus shells.

 

External link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6150448.ece

Back to news & media - year 2009

Back to main archive

Back to main index