The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings, Torture and Big Money

 

June 21st, 2008 - McClellan Testifies he was Wary of Libby’s Leak Denial but went along

News article by the Los Angeles Times

News article by the Washington Post

Summary of Valerie Plame vs. Lewis Libby

McClellan Testifies he was Wary of Libby’s Leak Denial but went along

The ex-press secretary who wrote a memoir of his White House days tells a House panel he was 'reluctant' to back Cheney's chief of staff but that Libby unequivocally denied exposing Valerie Plame's id

 

By Johanna Neuman

Los Angeles Times

June 21, 2008

 

Washington - Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on Friday, said he was suspicious of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's denial that he had leaked the name of a CIA agent but had no choice but to go along with it.

 

McClellan's testimony came shortly after his author's tour for "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception," the memoir that created a stir in the capital when it was published last month.

 

McClellan told the panel that former White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. asked him to publicly exonerate Libby from involvement in the case, as McClellan had done for White House political advisor Karl Rove. Libby was then chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney.

 

"I was reluctant to do it," McClellan said. "I got on the phone with Scooter Libby and asked him point-blank, 'Were you involved in this in any way?' And he assured me in unequivocal terms that he was not."

 

Libby was later convicted of lying to investigators about his role in leaking the identity of then-CIA operative Valerie Plame in an effort to discredit her husband, longtime diplomat Joseph C. Wilson IV, a critic of the Bush administration's stated reasons for invading Iraq. Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison, but President Bush commuted his sentence.

 

In opening remarks before the committee, McClellan repeated the charge in his book that the White House had tilted the evidence to convince the public of the need for war in Iraq. "It's public record that they were ignoring caveats and ignoring contradictory intelligence," he said.

 

"I do not know whether a crime was committed by any of the administration officials who revealed Valerie Plame's identity to reporters," he said. "Nor do I know if there was an attempt by any person or persons to engage in a cover-up during the investigation. I do know that it was wrong to reveal her identity, because it compromised the effectiveness of a covert official for political reasons. I regret that I played a role, however unintentionally, in relaying false information to the public about it."

 

He was particularly biting about Rove, saying that he doubted the former White House advisor would tell the truth to the committee, which has asked him to testify about his role in the Plame leak.

 

"I would hope that he would be willing to do so," McClellan said. "Based on my own experiences, I have some doubts. He lied to me."

 

Rove had also leaked Plame's name to reporters. Asked if Rove had lied to the president about the Plame matter, McClellan said, "I believe so."

 

McClellan was lionized by some representatives - Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) called his sentiments "noble" -- but attacked by others as a disgruntled ex-White House employee out to settle scores.

 

"Who is the real Scott McClellan?" asked the committee's ranking Republican, Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas. "The one who actually wrote in his book that the administration did not employ 'deception'? ... Or the one who elsewhere in the same book leveled self-serving accusations?"

 

Smith added, "While we may never know the answers, Scott McClellan alone will have to wrestle with whether it was worth selling out the president and his friends for a few pieces of silver."

 

McClellan hit back at former White House colleagues for "unsavory" reaction to his book, saying that some sought "to turn it into a game of 'gotcha,' misrepresenting what I wrote and seeking to discredit me through inaccurate personal attacks on my motives."

 

The attacks continued Friday as White House spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters, "I think Scott has probably told everyone everything he doesn't know, so I don't know if anyone should expect him to say anything new today."

 

During an afternoon of questioning, McClellan was asked why Bush, who had a reputation as governor of Texas for reaching out to Democrats, had become such a partisan figure in Washington. Speculating that Bush succumbed to "the way Washington works," McClellan said that although Bush was responsible for the course of his own presidency, Cheney and Rove were "negative influences on him."

 

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) asked McClellan whether he thought Cheney authorized Libby to leak Plame's identity. "I can't rule it out," McClellan said.

 

Calling McClellan's testimony an "enormously important ... glimpse into the truth," Wexler suggested impeachment proceedings. "Cheney is the only likely suspect" for authorizing the leak, Wexler said.

 

Pressed on whether he had ever witnessed the president misrepresent facts, McClellan repeated the accusation from his book that Bush declassified a national intelligence estimate to promote the war in Iraq.

 

"We had decried the leaking of national security information for years," he said. "This was a very disillusioning moment for me, to say the least."

 

Republicans expressed disdain for McClellan's motives, suggesting that he had disclosed secrets for maximum book sales rather than policy goals.

 

Rep. Ric Keller (R-Fla.) questioned why McClellan had disclosed that Bush pretended not to remember his cocaine use of 30 years before.

 

McClellan explained that Bush's willingness to fudge his memory on a personal issue "later transferred over" into how the administration attempted to sell the war.

 

Asked Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), "Could you not have taken some of this with you to the grave?"

 

External link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-mcclellan21-2008jun21,0,5383338.story


McClellan Testifies About Bush Team

Former Spokesman Says Little Beyond Details in His Book

 

By Dan Eggen

Washington Post

June 21, 2008

 

Scott McClellan, the former White House spokesman turned Bush administration critic, took to Capitol Hill yesterday to decry an insular and secretive White House that he said lied about the leaking of a CIA officer's name and "overstated" intelligence in the rush to war in Iraq.

 

McClellan, who served as President Bush's press secretary from 2003 to 2006 and is the author of a controversial new book, also said Bush squandered the public's trust by not following through on promises to fire those involved in disclosing the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson and to publicly divulge details about the case.

 

"The continuing cloud of suspicion over the White House is not something I can remove, because I know only one part of the story," McClellan said during several hours of testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. "Only those who know the underlying truth can bring this to an end. Sadly, they remain silent."

 

McClellan was a longtime Bush aide whose best-selling book, "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception," has caused a political uproar. It contains sharp criticism of the president and his senior aides on a variety of topics, including the handling of prewar intelligence and the bungled response to Hurricane Katrina.

 

The former Bush insider received a warm welcome from the judiciary panel's Democratic majority, which attempted, generally without success, to get him to go beyond the material in his book. Republicans, meanwhile, lined up to question McClellan's motives, attack his publishing house and pressing him on why he did not raise doubts while on the job.

 

"While we may never know the answers, Scott McClellan alone will have to wrestle with whether it was worth selling out the president and his friends for a few pieces of silver," said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.), the panel's ranking Republican.

 

The partisan tenor of the hearing appeared to illustrate one of McClellan's central arguments: that Washington is seized by a "permanent campaign" that adheres to a "philosophy of politics as war," as he put it yesterday.

 

"Too often in Washington, people mistakenly think that loyalty to an individual officeholder should override loyalty to basic ideals," McClellan said in his opening remarks. "This false loyalty is not only mistaken but can exercise a corrupt influence on government."

 

The White House, which has been unusually sharp in its criticism of a former loyalist, generally tried to ignore McClellan yesterday. "I think Scott has probably told everyone everything he doesn't know, so I don't know if anyone should expect ... to see anything new today," spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters traveling with Bush.

 

McClellan returned to several key points during his testimony, including his stance that the Bush administration "sold the nation on the premise that Iraq was a grave and gathering danger" by using intelligence reports that were "overstated" and "overpackaged."

 

At the same time, McClellan emphasized that he did not believe that Bush or his aides purposely misled the country about Iraq.

 

Judging from his testimony and book, McClellan was particularly unhappy about the way the Wilson case was handled, including his unwitting role in passing on inaccurate information to reporters.

 

McClellan recounted a September 2003 episode, described in his book, that revolved around I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's top aide at the time, and Karl Rove, then political aide to Bush. After receiving assurances from Rove, McClellan had told reporters that Rove was not involved in the disclosure of Wilson's identity to the media.

 

Andrew Card, who was Bush's chief of staff, contacted McClellan on a Saturday and said that Bush and Cheney wanted him to provide the same public assurances about Libby. After speaking to Libby, McClellan said, he informed reporters that Libby was not involved.

 

Courtroom testimony and other evidence later showed that both Rove and Libby had spoken to reporters about Wilson, although neither was the initial source for Robert D. Novak, whose column was at the heart of the case. Libby was later convicted of lying and obstructing justice. Bush commuted Libby's prison sentence, a move that McClellan criticized.

 

McClellan was particularly acerbic in his criticism of Rove. He indicated that he believes Rove misled Bush about his involvement in the Wilson case and said that he would not trust testimony from Rove that was not under oath. He also said Bush should have followed through on his promise to fire anyone involved with the leak, including Rove.

 

"If he had adhered to his word, then Karl Rove wouldn't have ... been in the administration," he said.

 

Fratto said the administration is still limited in what it can say about the case because of an ongoing civil lawsuit by Wilson and her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV. "I'm not sure, but maybe McClellan has forgotten the policy, although he repeated it many times from the podium," Fratto said in an e-mail.

 

Rove declined to comment.

 

External link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/20/ST2008062001160.html

Back to news & media - year 2008

Back to main archive

Back to main index