The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings, Torture and Big Money

 

October 7th, 2007 - Blackwater Unprovoked, 17 Killed, Iraqi Probe Finds

News article by Agence France Presse

1st news article by the Los Angeles Times

2nd news article by the Los Angeles Times

Summary of the Blackwater Killings

Blackwater Unprovoked, 17 Killed, Iraqi Probe Finds

 

By Agence France Presse

October 7, 2007

 

Baghdad - US security contractor Blackwater was unprovoked when it opened fire on civilians in Baghdad three weeks ago, killing 17 people and wounding 22, an Iraqi probe into the shooting has found.

 

The Iraqi government would now take "judicial measures to punish the company," government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said in a statement on Sunday.

 

"The investigation committee appointed by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki ... has finished its inquiry and has found that there was no evidence that the convoy of Blackwater came under fire directly or indirectly," he said.

 

"It was not touched even by a stone," the statement said.

 

It gave the toll from the shootings as 17 dead, considerably higher than the previous toll according to which at least 10 people had been killed. The statement said 22 people had been wounded.

 

"Employees of the company violated the rules governing use of force by security companies," the statement said. "They have committed a crime and should be punished under the law."

 

The report came hours after a joint US-Iraqi commission examining the work of private security firms in Iraq held its first meeting in Baghdad.

 

The commission is looking at the September 16 incident involving Blackwater as well as at the wider business of private security contractors in Iraq.

 

Blackwater maintains its men were legitimately responding to an ambush while protecting a US State Department convoy, but they are widely accused of firing indiscriminately into crowded Nisoor Square.

 

Sunday's meeting was co-chaired by Iraqi Defence Minister Abdel Qader Mohammed Jassim and the US embassy's Patricia Butenis.

 

The commission is comprised of five embassy representatives, three from the US military and eight Iraqis.

 

"The two sides agreed to continue their coordination and to complete the process of inquiry in order to prevent the recurrence of any incidents in the future," said a statement from the co-chairs.

 

The commission will issue a report with recommendations to the Iraqi and US governments aimed at improving procedures so that the work of security contractors does not endanger the public, it said.

 

It did not say when the report would be issued, but an embassy spokeswoman has told AFP that the commission must first review the findings of a separate probe by the State Department's regional security office.

 

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's envoy, Ambassador Patrick Kennedy, is meanwhile conducting an overall review of how the State Department conducts its protective security detail operations in Iraq.

 

Based on his initial findings, Rice on Friday tightened control of Blackwater's operations in Iraq, ordering security agents from the State Department to accompany every convoy.

 

The State Department said on Thursday it had ceded the lead role in the investigation of Blackwater, which is accused of involvement in nearly 200 shootings in Iraq, to the FBI.

 

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates has also launched a review on his department's use of private security contractors.

 

Copyright © 2007 AFP.

 

External link: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j4L1VeJBtnJF5C_M43uS-2xd0peg


State Dept. ignored Blackwater warnings

Diplomats had raised concerns about guards’ endangering of Iraqi civilians, but the complaints got little attention.

 

By Paul Richter

Los Angeles Times

October 7, 2007

 

Washington - The State Department, which is facing growing criticism of its policy on private security contractors, overlooked repeated warnings from U.S. diplomats in the field that guards were endangering Iraqi civilians and undermining U.S. efforts to win support from the population, according to current and former U.S. officials.

 

Ever since the contractors were granted immunity from Iraqi courts in June 2004 by the U.S.-led occupation authority, diplomats have cautioned that the decision to do so was "a bomb that could go off at any time," said one former U.S. official.

 

But State Department leadership, unable to field U.S. troops or in-house personnel to guard its team, has clung to an approach that shielded the contractors from criminal liability, in the hope of ensuring continued protection to operate in the violent countryside.

 

The procedures have come under critical scrutiny since a Sept. 16 shooting involving contractors for Blackwater USA, the State Department's main security contractor, killed at least 11 Iraqis and set off a series of American and Iraqi investigations.

 

On Friday, in a tacit acknowledgment of the policy's shortcomings, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ordered drastic increases in supervision of the security contractors. Meanwhile, the House, flatly rejecting the current approach, on Thursday approved in a 389-30 vote legislation that would subject contractors to U.S. criminal law.

 

The developments - and the dramatically heightened attention to violence involving security contractors - have not surprised current and former officials who have served in Iraq and seen incidents that injured Iraqis and destroyed their property.

 

"It's about time," said Janessa Gans, who was a U.S. official in Iraq for nearly two years, describing her reaction to news that the Iraqi government was threatening to expel Blackwater in the aftermath of the Sept. 16 shooting.

 

Gans said that during her travels around the country she saw heavily armed contract guards frighten Iraqi civilians and destroy their property, and she was shocked that they appeared to have so little accountability and that the Iraqis often found it difficult to obtain justice or compensation.

 

Gans, who related her experiences in an interview and in an opinion article published in Saturday's Times, described one incident. In 2005, a heavily armored Chevy Suburban at the head of her U.S. convoy smashed into a tiny car carrying an elderly man, a younger woman and three frightened children.

 

When she objected, the contractors pointed out that they were trained to treat all Iraqis as potential terrorists. Gans said she replied: "If they weren't terrorists before, they certainly are now."

 

Several other officials formerly assigned to duty in Iraq agreed to discuss concerns about security procedures but insisted on anonymity because they still are employed by the government and are not authorized to express their views. Some officials who have had similar experiences while at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad declined to describe them out of concern that they could be identified through the details of their accounts.

 

Their views of Blackwater and other security contractors are at odds with the descriptions in recent weeks from Rice and other top State Department officials, who have praised the guards as providing effective service under dangerous conditions.

 

Blackwater's chief executive noted last week that no U.S. official has been killed under Blackwater's protection.

 

Nonetheless, concerns have been voiced at times even by the most senior U.S. officials in Iraq. Former U.S. ambassador to Iraq John D. Negroponte, now the deputy secretary of State, had been overheard urging contractors to slow down and take more care as they careened through the streets.

 

"He was frequently exasperated," Gans said. "He would say, 'Is that necessary?' "

 

Gans said she complained to high-level embassy officials. Other current and former officials said that the concerns frequently were discussed among embassy staff and were acknowledged by some members of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, which oversees contractors for the State Department.

 

But the complaints and concerns received little high-level attention, for several reasons, said diplomats who served in Iraq. In the crisis atmosphere of Iraq, the security problems seemed less urgent than other issues. In addition, even staff members who were uneasy with the arrangement were ambivalent because they wanted aggressive protection when they felt personally endangered.

 

When leaving the gates of the U.S.-controlled Green Zone, "you want the biggest, meanest guys in the world protecting you," said a U.S. official who served in Baghdad and has been moved to another post in the region.

 

The private security contractors working for the State Department have operated under murky legal guidelines. While U.S. laws apply to contractors working for the Pentagon, workers for the State Department do not fall clearly under American or Iraqi law, allowing some to escape punishment for wrongdoing.

 

In May 2005, an Iraqi cabdriver with two passengers in the back seat was traveling down a broad thoroughfare when a five-car U.S. convoy carrying U.S. officials heading back to the Green Zone approached from a side street. The driver, Mohammed Nouri Hattab, 34, stopped about 50 feet from the convoy, but bullets ripped into his Opel, killing one passenger and striking Hattab's shoulder.

 

"There was no warning," Hattab, who suffered lasting damage to his arm, later told a reporter. "It was a sudden attack."

 

Hattab was forced to go on disability leave from his Oil Ministry job at half pay and struggled without success to get compensation from the U.S. government.

 

Two Blackwater employees were fired for failing to follow proper procedures in the incident. They were flown back to the United States after an investigation by embassy security personnel, but faced no subsequent prosecution.

 

The procedure was similar in a well-known incident last Christmas Eve, when a Blackwater employee left a party and fatally shot a bodyguard to Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul Mahdi. Within 36 hours, security officials investigated the case and whisked the shooter back to the United States.

 

In the wake of the Sept. 16 shootings, Justice Department officials are looking into the Christmas Eve case to see if further action is warranted.

 

Many of the current and former U.S. officials said nearly all of the contractors they dealt with were highly professional. But in the violent atmosphere of Iraq, even a small percentage of "renegades" can inflict enormous damage, some said.

 

Iraqi politicians frequently have complained about the behavior of American security contractors, said Gans, who believes the constant friction undermined American efforts to improve relations.

 

"There are so many things going on in Iraq that seemed unfair," said Gans, now a visiting professor at Principia College in Illinois. "But this piece of it was unbelievable."

 

State Department leaders, appearing last week before a House committee investigating the issue, said that practical considerations had led to their decision to rely on private contractors for diplomatic security.

 

Faced with a need for protection and no access to the limited numbers of U.S. troops, the State Department had a choice between waiting at least 18 months to assemble a sufficient force of State Department staff security agents or hiring contractors. In addition, they said they did not believe at first that the Iraq mission would be long-lived.

 

While contractors are expensive, a single Bureau of Diplomatic Security agent costs nearly $500,000 a year, said Richard J. Griffin, assistant secretary of State for diplomatic security.

 

Peter W. Singer, a Brookings Institution scholar who has studied the issue, said that though diplomats in the field clearly "have been upset with this," they have felt they had no other choice.

 

"It's not like there was ever a high-level review of this," he said. U.S. officials in charge "didn't want to make the hard choices. So they outsourced the hard choices."

 

Times staff writers Borzou Daragahi in Beirut, T. Christian Miller in Santa Rosa, Maggie Farley at the United Nations, Tina Susman in Baghdad and Laura King in Islamabad contributed to this report.

 

External link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-blackwater7oct07,1,4799501.story


Widow of Iraqi guard still awaits compensation

A U.S. sum offered to her in the killing of her husband by a Blackwater USA employee dwindled from $250,000 to $15,000, according to State Department documents.

 

By Tina Susman and Raheem Salman

Los Angeles Times

October 7, 2007

 

Baghdad - The widow of an Iraqi vice presidential guard shot to death on Christmas Eve by a Blackwater USA employee said today she has not yet received any compensation.

 

Umm Sajjad said the office of Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul Mehdi, for whom her husband was working when he died, was handling the case and told her that they had rejected the proposed sum as too low. State Department documents say that Blackwater and the U.S. State Department had agreed that $15,000 was a fair amount.

 

An official in Mehdi's office said the vice president was seeking $100,000 for the family. The official said $20,000 had been sent but that it had not been given to the guard's family because the office felt it was too little. The official requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the sensitive topic.

 

There was no immediate response to an e-mailed request for information sent early today to Blackwater's spokeswoman, Anne Tyrrell.

 

The slaying of Sajjad's husband, Raheem Khalif Hulaichi, by an allegedly drunk Blackwater employee has been cited by critics of the company and the State Department as an example of how Blackwater was allowed to operate with virtual impunity in Iraq. Details of the case came to light last week as congressional hearings were held into Blackwater, whose guards are accused of killing at least 11 Iraqis on Sept. 16 at a crowded Baghdad intersection.

 

Blackwater says its guards fired in self-defense after being ambushed. Iraqi witnesses say they fired without provocation.

 

The congressional hearings delved into the case of Hulaichi, who was on guard duty the night of Dec. 24, 2006. Witness accounts contained in documents presented at the hearing indicate that the Blackwater guard smelled of alcohol and was visibly drunk after the shooting, which took place outside the vice president's compound inside Baghdad's Green Zone.

 

Hulaichi, 33, was shot in the head and died, leaving a widow and two sons, ages 6 and 10. The Blackwater employee claimed he shot in self-defense, but he was fired from his job. He was flown out of Iraq by U.S. officials and never charged with a crime.

 

"I heard that there was going to be compensation from the security company, but so far nothing has been received. Not a single penny," said Umm Sajjad. She spoke in an interview from her small house in Sadr City, the sprawling Shiite Muslim slum in northeastern Baghdad.

 

She said she wanted only enough money to put her sons through school and buy a house. Currently, they rent a 225-square-foot dwelling in Sadr City.

 

According to State Department documents, a U.S. Embassy official in Baghdad, who was not identified, initially recommended that Blackwater pay $250,000 to the guard's family and then lowered the sum to $100,000. Both amounts were dismissed as too high by the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service, and an amount of $15,000 was agreed upon.

 

Because the incident occurred about the same time that ousted leader Saddam Hussein was being prepared for execution, it was barely noted in the local media. One brief mention on local TV news blamed the shooting on a "drunken U.S. soldier."

 

An e-mail from a Blackwater official in Baghdad to another company official noted the error with some relief. "At least the ID of the shooter will take the heat off of us," said the Dec. 27, 2006 message, which was contained in documents compiled for last week's hearings. The names of the correspondents were blacked out.

 

External link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq8oct08,0,4329151.story

Back to news & media - year 2007

Back to main archive

Back to main index