The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings, Torture and Big Money

 

August 4th, 2007 - 2 Juries, 2 Sentences for Iraqi Man’s Death

News article by the San Diego Union-Tribune

News article by North County Times

Summary of the Hashim Al-Zobaie Killing

2 Juries, 2 Sentences for Iraqi Man’s Death

Marine gets 15 years; comrade demoted but not imprisoned

 

By Steve Liewer and Rick Rogers

San Diego Union-Tribune

August 4, 2007

 

Concluding a case that sparked soul-searching throughout the Marine Corps, two military juries handed down vastly different sentences for essentially the same crimes yesterday.

 

Their pronouncements suggest a sharp division over what is criminal and what, for lack of a better phrase, is the reality of sending young troops to fight where the enemy seemingly lurks everywhere.

 

Sgt. Lawrence G. Hutchins III and Cpl. Marshall L. Magincalda stood in neighboring courtrooms at Camp Pendleton to receive their sentences from panels of their combat-hardened peers.

 

Hutchins, who oversaw the kidnapping and killing of an Iraqi man in Hamdaniya last year, received 15 years in prison, a demotion and a dishonorable discharge. Magincalda, who helped snatch and tie up the victim, also was demoted but will not spend another day in the brig.

 

“In this chaotic climate in Iraq, clean, clear judgments are hard to come by,” said Eugene R. Fidell, a former Coast Guard judge advocate and president of the National Institute of Military Justice in Washington.

 

Near noon yesterday, Hutchins sighed deeply before standing to hear his sentence. As the gravity of the jury foreman's words sank in, he slumped to his chair and rested his head on the defense table. When he lifted his head, his eyes appeared red and moist.

 

His mother, sitting behind him in the court gallery, wept into her husband's shoulder. His wife, Reyna, lowered her face and sobbed. His 2-year-old daughter remained oblivious, continuing to talk and sing.

 

A few minutes later, Hutchins kissed his wife on cheek to console her.

 

“This whole situation is tragic. It's very sad,” said the prosecutor, Capt. Nick Gannon, who had asked the jury to return a 30-year sentence.

 

Defense attorney Rich Brannon realized the sentence could have been worse, but that thought gave him little solace.

 

“I've tried to tell myself that it's OK, but it's not all right,” Brannon said. “The (Hutchins) family is really, really hurt.”

 

Brannon said he will ask Lt. Gen. James Mattis, commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton, to reduce his client's sentence. Barring an unlikely turn of events, Hutchins will complete his prison term in the military penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

 

The gloom in the Hutchins courtroom contrasted starkly with the joy in Magincalda's a few hours earlier. The jury in that trial limited Magincalda's prison term to 448 days – the amount of time he already had served while undergoing court proceedings.

 

The prosecution had sought a 10-year sentence, while the defense asked for no additional jail time and no punitive discharge.

 

A dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge would have prevented Magincalda from receiving future benefits – including medical care – through the military or Department of Veterans Affairs.

 

After the jury delivered its sentence, the lead defense attorney, Joseph Low, smiled and patted his client on the back.

 

Magincalda hugged his parents and stepsisters.

 

“I'm very happy, and I'm proud I'll still be able to serve as a Marine,” Magincalda said during a news conference after the sentencing.

 

But with a demotion and felony conviction on his record, it is unclear whether he will be allowed to stay in the Marine Corps.

 

“I did my time,” Magincalda said. “If the military will still have me, I'll stay in.”

 

He also said the jurors' Iraq war duty probably helped them pass appropriate judgment.

 

“I think they had some really true insight about what we're talking about, what we've been through,” Magincalda said. “I was very happy that I got a fair trial.”

 

The Hutchins and Magincalda sentences capped a saga that began on the evening of April 25, 2006, in a palm grove outside the insurgent-filled town of Hamdaniya.

 

There, seven Marines and a Navy corpsman from Camp Pendleton's Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment bought into Hutchins' plot to kill a suspected insurgent named Saleh Gowad. They had become exasperated after repeatedly arresting Gowad and turning him over to Iraqi authorities, only to see him released each time.

 

Around midnight, several Marines from the squad went to grab their target. They decided to snatch a neighbor after failing to find Gowad.

 

The Marines marched their victim, a grandfather whose identity remains in dispute, to a roadside hole. They gagged him, bound his hands and feet, and then riddled his body with bullets.

 

The unit tried to cover up its vigilante-style execution. It placed a shovel, an AK-47 rifle and shell casings around the corpse to create the appearance of a firefight between U.S. personnel and an insurgent who was trying to plant a bomb.

 

Military investigators soon unraveled the crime, which has shocked a range of human-rights advocates, legal experts and political leaders in the United States and Iraq.

 

The Hamdaniya killing also sparked concern from senior military officials. It and another war-crimes case involving Camp Pendleton troops prompted top military brass to visit bases nationwide and in Iraq. The commanders lectured service members about combat rules and battlefield ethics.

 

But the Hamdaniya case also generated a groundswell of support for the defendants.

 

Many active-duty Marines and military veterans rallied around them. Some of the backers held protests outside Camp Pendleton's front gate. Others raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to help the defendants pay their legal bills.

 

Relatively early in the judicial process, the squad's five most junior members signed plea agreements with the government. They pleaded guilty to offenses less than murder, receiving prison sentences of one to eight years in exchange for their testimony against the remaining defendants.

 

In the past month, the court-martial juries for Hutchins, Magincalda and Cpl. Trent D. Thomas delivered highly varying verdicts.

 

They convicted all three Marines of conspiracy but found only Hutchins guilty of murder.

 

“At least there was a conviction, and at least the ringleader was brought to justice (for the killing),” said Auday Arabo, an Iraqi-American lawyer from San Diego who said he followed the case closely. “Personally, I'm not going to second-guess a jury of military men who have served in Iraq.”

 

Arabo noted that in many other countries, it would be unthinkable to charge a service member for killing someone during wartime.

 

“We have to walk on the moral high ground,” he said. “We are the beacon of light, and we can't let our standards down.”

 

Some observers said the larger question is what impact these mixed verdicts will have on troops who must make life-and-death decisions in Iraq.

 

“They have to be very vigilant in complying with the rules of engagement,” said John Huston, dean of the Franklin Pierce Law Center in New Hampshire and former staff judge advocate of the Navy and Marine Corps. “I hope they conclude that they should not conspire to murder anyone.”

 

External link: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20070804-9999-7n4hamda.html


Marine gets 15 years for Hamdania killing

Attorney says Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins will ask general for relief

 

By Teri Figueroa

North County Times

August 4, 2007 6:17 AM PDT

 

Camp Pendleton - The first Marine convicted of murdering an Iraqi in the war zone since the U.S. invasion sunk into his chair and put his head on the table Friday afternoon after he learned his fate: 15 years in prison.

 

The punishment was a punch in the gut to Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins, as well as an about face from decisions made by other juries, who convicted his accused squad mates on lesser charges and set them free.

 

Hutchins was the leader of the squad whose members admitted they kidnapped and killed an Iraqi man. He was also the highest-ranking Marine among the accused, and according to testimony, he was the chief architect of a killing plot crafted in a palm grove during an overnight patrol.

 

"I felt all along that fingers would be pointed at my client," Hutchins' attorney Rich Brannon said after the verdict. "He was what you would call the lead defendant. I felt like the other defendants had a better chance."

 

Hutchins' jury, made up of combat veterans, also sentenced the squad leader to a reduction in rank to private, a dishonorable discharge and a reprimand for his role as the mastermind in a plot that left an Iraqi man shot to death in Hamdania on April 26, 2006.

 

Brannon said he would ask Lt. Gen. James Mattis to review the sentence. As head of all Marine Corps forces in the Middle East, Mattis is the convening authority over the Hamdania cases.

 

Although there will be automatic appeals and a plea for relief, the jury's decision drops the curtain on much of the saga for eight Camp Pendleton squad members who became known as the Pendleton Eight last summer. All were charged with murder in June 2006 for their roles in the killing.

 

The sentence came as the military base is dealing with criminal charges brought in another case, in which another squad of men is accused of wrongfully killing 24 civilians in the Iraqi city of Haditha.

 

In the Hamdania case, Hutchins' No. 2 and No. 3 men were acquitted of murder, but found guilty of conspiracy and sentenced to time served. That amounted to less than 15 months each.

 

‘The disparity is a lot’

 

As the jury foreman announced the punishment, the sergeant's wife, Reyna Hutchins, put her head to her knees. She sobbed inconsolably as she sat in the audience behind her husband throughout the rest of the short hearing, while the couple's nearly 3-year-old daughter quietly sang to herself. Hutchins' mother slumped over onto the shoulder of Hutchins' father.

 

As the family left the courtroom, Hutchins put his arm around his wife, kissed her hard on the side of the face and whispered in her ear.

 

"The family is really, really hurt," Brannon said. "They feel like the disparity (with the sentences for his squad mates) is a lot."

 

A few hours before Hutchins learned his fate, his squad mate Cpl. Marshall Magincalda, who was acquitted of murder but convicted of conspiracy in the plot, listened as a jury told him he would be walking free.

 

Two weeks ago, release from the brig was also part of the same sentence handed down to now Pvt. Trent Thomas - he was also busted down from corporal and will be given a bad-conduct discharge.

 

The remainder of the squad, all of whom were charged with murder, pleaded guilty to reduced charges and testified against their accused squad mates from Kilo Company in the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment.

 

Their testimony was the meat of the government's cases.

 

According to them, Hutchins' plan targeted a highly suspected insurgent said to be behind roadside bombings and other attacks on troops in the rural area of Hamdania, outside of Baghdad.

 

When they couldn't reach him, they snatched and killed his neighbor, then reported they had killed him in a firefight.

 

The squad members who testified said the point of the killing was to send a message to insurgents that roadside bombs and attacks on troops would not be tolerated in the area.

 

And in asking the jury to sentence Hutchins to 30-years in prison, prosecutor Capt. Nicholas Gannon asked the panel of Iraq war veterans to "send a message" to other Marines to "communicate what lawless vigilantism will bring."

 

"You have to communicate with a sentence that is severe enough that the moment of truth, right before something really bad happens, somebody has the fortitude to stand up and say no," Gannon said. "The ramifications of what you do here today, it will become very clear that, while difficult, while challenging, it is necessary."

 

It took the jury of five officers and four enlisted men about three hours to settle on Hutchins' sentence. Convicting of him of murder took two days.

 

‘A tragic mistake’

 

The testimony from the junior Marines and a corpsman at the courts-martial for Hutchins, Magincalda and Thomas shined light on the frustrations the squad faced in combat, particularly with seeing a man regarded as the lead insurgent in the Hamdania area repeatedly released from custody.

 

Defense attorneys in both Hutchins' and Magincalda's cases did not deny that their clients played a role in the plot. But they argued that violence toward Iraqi detainees was encouraged by the men's superiors.

 

Jurors heard testimony from Marines that superiors in their company beat Iraqi suspects during questioning and shoved guns in their faces or mouths. And Lt. Nathan Phan, who was in charge of the platoon, testified that he had directed Hutchins to choke another Iraqi detainee until he was unconscious. The Marine Corps reprimanded Phan earlier this year.

 

Phan also testified that he and the squad had talked about killing local insurgents, and that his attitude may have shaped the kidnapping and slaying plot. But he did not order Marines to do what they did on the night in question, he said.

 

During Thomas' trial, one of the convicted squad members, Pvt. Robert Pennington, told the jury that "in the end, the actions we took prevented bodily harm or death to Marines."

 

And at Hutchins trial, Pennington told the jury that he and his squad mates were "sick of" the rules of engagement and "decided to write our own rules to keep ourselves alive."

 

During his sentencing hearing, Hutchins spoke about his squad's "frustration" with their inability to keep the area's lead insurgent in custody. The sergeant did not offer apologies for the slaying.

 

Attorney Brannon said the lack of remorse likely had "a significant impact" on the jury, but that "Sgt. Hutchins feels like he did what he was told."

 

"We had a tragic mistake, although I think it was command-influenced," Brannon said, "and I think it is very difficult emotionally for Larry to deal with that mistake."

 

‘Vagaries of the jury system’

 

Four of the five men who pleaded guilty to lesser charges made deals that gave them less than two years of jail time. Two of those men have already served their time and been released from the brig.

 

Pennington was the fifth man to plead guilty. He agreed to an eight-year prison sentence in exchange for his testimony.

 

Hutchins' 15-year sentence was a surprise to Gary Solis, a retired Marine legal officer who teaches military law at Georgetown University, given the decisions by other juries to let Hutchins squad mates go free.

 

"This illustrates the vagaries of the jury system," Solis said in a phone call to his Washington D.C. office. "There's no predicting what a jury will do. Some will think that this jury is overly harsh, others will think that it is appropriate in its sentence."

 

He also noted that some felt the decisions by other juries were appropriate, while others found it too lenient.

 

The decision to prosecute the men for actions in a war zone, he said, tells him that the Marine Corps "takes the offenses seriously."

 

"It sends its own message that the Marine Corps won't tolerate it," Solis said.

 

According to Solis' research, of the 27 Marines who were convicted of unlawfully killing Vietnamese civilians, 15 were handed life sentences. An additional three Marines got sentences of more than 20 years, and two others were sentenced to 10 years.

 

The longest sentence served by any of those Marines convicted for killing Vietnamese civilians was 12 years and one month, Solis found.

 

External link: http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/08/04/news/top_stories/1_01_258_1_07.txt

Back to news & media - year 2007

Back to main archive

Back to main index