The War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings, Torture and Big Money

 

June 7th, 2007 - Haditha Slayings Were Seen As Combat-Related

News article by Los Angeles Times

News article of the Associated Press

Summary of the Haditha Massacre

Haditha Slayings Were Seen As Combat-Related

Officers decided that the 24 Iraqi civilian deaths occurred amid a complex insurgent attack, a Marine testifies.

 

By Tony Perry

Los Angeles Times

June 7, 2007

 

Camp Pendleton - Defending the lack of a war-crimes investigation in the killing of 24 Iraqi civilians in Haditha, a Marine intelligence officer testified Wednesday that it appeared the deaths had occurred in the midst of a series of attacks by insurgents that Marines had been strongly warned to anticipate.

 

Capt. Jeffrey Dinsmore said that Marine officers decided the deaths were combat-related and thus no investigation was warranted. His testimony came during an Article 32 inquiry, similar to a preliminary hearing, for a former battalion commander.

 

In a sometimes bitter exchange with prosecutors, he denounced the Marine Corps for charging Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani with dereliction of duty.

 

"Politically, the Marine Corps made a decision to hang Col. Chessani out to dry," said Dinsmore, who has served for 20 years and is now deployed to Iraq. He added that he feels the investigation is hurting the corps.

 

The military began an investigation of the Nov. 19, 2005, killings only after Time magazine began questioning the Marines' assertion that the civilians had been killed in crossfire between Marines and insurgents.

 

Dinsmore, in testimony that was videotaped earlier this year, said Marines had developed intelligence prompting them to prepare for a complex attack involving roadside bombs and small-arms fire, with insurgents hiding among civilians in their homes.

 

The events seemed to fit that pattern, he said: A bomb exploding under a Humvee and a nearby firefight that erupted after Marines stormed three houses and killed 19 civilians inside.

 

With an increasing tone of incredulity, Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan, the lead prosecutor in the Article 32 inquiry for Chessani, repeatedly asked Dinsmore whether he had requested a report on the deaths of 24 civilians in the Haditha incident.

 

"No, sir," Dinsmore answered.

 

Chessani is accused of failing to launch a war crimes investigation of the deaths of five men outside their car as well as three women, seven children and nine men inside the three houses.

 

All were killed by Marines from Chessani's 3rd Battalion, 1st Regiment. Dinsmore was the lead intelligence officer for the battalion and was involved in developing reports for superiors on the day of the killings; he has not been charged in the case.

 

Three days after the killings, Maj. Gen. Richard Huck, then commander of the 2nd Marine Division, came to the central Iraqi town for a routine update.

 

Huck, who also has not been charged, testified last week that after he saw a slide show put on by battalion officers, he was satisfied the deaths were combat-related. Dinsmore testified that Huck congratulated the Marines for repulsing attacks.

 

The bloodshed began early in the morning when a roadside bomb exploded beneath a Marine convoy, killing a Marine. In short order, fellow Marines killed five men outside their car and were ordered to "clear" houses nearby, resulting in the 19 other deaths.

Marines had told their platoon commander that they had heard gunfire from the direction of the houses, although no weapons or shell casings were found in or near the car nor in the houses, according to testimony.

 

Within minutes of the Humvee blast and house-clearing, another group of Marines was engaged in a firefight about 1,000 yards away in a palm grove. That battle left numerous troops wounded and ended with the Marines calling for an airstrike.

 

As they later reconstructed the events of the day, Marines were convinced that the bombing and the firefight in the palm grove were part of the same attack, Dinsmore testified.

 

Two or three days before the killings, Marines had learned that fighters from Syria were in Haditha, waiting to ambush them, Dinsmore said.

 

After Humvee blast, Marine officers called for an aerial drone to scan the scene. Once it arrived, the firefight at the palm grove was underway, officers have testified.

 

Among other things, the drone broadcast a picture of an insurgent who had been involved in the palm grove firefight running into a nearby house and emerging with different clothing and carrying a baby.

 

With that image in mind, officers decided that it was logical that insurgents had been hiding in houses and firing on Marines after the explosion that killed Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas.

 

Prosecutors have suggested that the Marines, wary as a result of their intelligence reports, may have only imagined that they were being fired on after the Humvee was attacked.

 

Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich, the squad leader who led the house-clearing, told his platoon commander that Marines had used grenades inside the houses after hearing AK-47s being prepared for firing and after taking fire from an insurgent, platoon commander 1st Lt. William Kallop testified this week.

 

Wuterich is one of three enlisted Marines charged with murder. Four officers are charged with dereliction of duty.

 

External link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-haditha7jun07,1,3896840.story


Haditha probe called political

 

By Thomas Watkins

Associated Press

June 7, 2007

 

Camp Pendleton, Calif. - Seven Marines accused in the deaths of 24 Iraqi civilians cannot be guaranteed a fair trial because the prosecution is politically motivated, a Marine officer said in testimony played in court Wednesday.

 

Capt. Jeffrey Dinsmore, the intelligence officer for the battalion accused in the 2005 killings in Haditha, was called as a witness at the preliminary hearing for Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, an officer charged with dereliction of duty for failing to investigate the deaths.

 

"You told me that politically, the Marine Corps had made a decision to hang Lt. Col. Chessani out to dry," prosecutor Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan asked Dinsmore, who replied, "Yes."

 

Dinsmore, whose testimony was videotaped in March, said he doubted prosecutors could be objective, given the politics surrounding the case, and said Chessani was "above reproach."

 

The Haditha killings sparked the biggest criminal case against U.S. troops in the war in Iraq, with three enlisted Marines charged with murder and four officers accused of dereliction.

 

The two dozen people were killed after a roadside bomb killed Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas, who was driving a Humvee. In the aftermath, Marines went house to house looking for insurgents.

 

They used fragmentation grenades and machine guns to clear the homes, but instead of hitting insurgents, they killed civilians.

 

Anti-war observers seized on the deaths as evidence that the troops killed indiscriminately.

 

The Marines who fired the fatal shots say they reacted to a perceived threat the way they were trained, and the officers say they saw no evidence of a law-of-war violation.

 

Chessani's defense team called Dinsmore as a witness to describe what was happening around Haditha in the months leading up to the killings. His testimony was videotaped because he was heading overseas for deployment.

 

He said insurgents regularly used hospitals and mosques to launch attacks. Men pretending to be asleep in a house fatally shot a Marine when he entered.

 

"They would exploit any hesitation in order to gain an advantage," he said.

 

After he learned of the roadside bomb blast, Dinsmore said he sent an unmanned aerial surveillance vehicle into the skies above Haditha, where it circled for much of the rest of the day.

 

The bomb that killed Terrazas was only the first of a citywide series of attacks that injured several other Marines and killed insurgents, Dinsmore said. He recalled Nov. 19 as the busiest day of combat in the battalion's tour.

 

Grainy, black-and-white images captured by the aerial drone were briefly displayed in the courtroom. The photographs showed what Dinsmore described as insurgents meeting in a palm grove and a house in which they subsequently hid.

 

Marines went on to raid that house, but several were injured when insurgents threw grenades at them. The Marines then ordered a missile strike that destroyed the house and killed its occupants.

 

Dinsmore said the Marine battalion felt at the end of the day that they had done well. The commanding general in charge of Marines in Haditha at the time, Maj. Gen. Richard A. Huck, was briefed about the day's combat actions three days later, including details about women and children dying in their homes.

 

Huck was "congratulatory" about the battalion's actions, Dinsmore testified.

 

Dinsmore and other Marines initially said eight of the 24 Iraqis killed were insurgents, a claim repeated up and down the chain of command and in a news release the day after the attack. But under cross-examination from Sullivan, Dinsmore conceded he had no solid evidence to support the claim and said it was possible that all 24 of the Iraqi dead were innocent civilians.

 

At the end of Chessani's hearing, an investigating officer will make a recommendation about whether the charges should go to trial.

 

External link: http://contracostatimes.com/nationandworld/ci_6078520

Back to news & media - year 2007

Back to main archive

Back to main index