|
The
War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings & Torture |
|
The Blackwater Killings Civil Suit II |
|
Case File: Civil Lawsuit for the
September 9th 2007 Killings |
|
|
|
Estate of Ali Ibrahim Albazzaz et al vs.
Erik Prince, Xe, Blackwater Worldwide et al U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia Case No.: 1:09-cv-616-JCC-JFA Filed on June 2nd, 2009 Prior to June 2nd, 2009: Estate of Ali Hussamaldeen Albazzaz vs.
Blackwater USA, Erik Prince et al U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia Case No.: 1:07-cv-02273-RBW Filed on December 19th, 2007 On
July 17th, 2009 this case was consolidated with Blackwater Civil
Cases, Nos. I, III, VI, VII, VIII & IX. July
17th, 2009 - Order July
13th, 2009 - Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint June
12th, 2009 - Order
Granting Enlargement of Time for Defendants to Answer Complaint June
11th, 2009 - Defendants’
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement June 2nd,
2009 - Complaint March
28th, 2008 - Entry March
28th, 2008 - Plaintiff’s
Motion for Leave to Amend March
28th, 2008 - Minute Order March
21st, 2008 - Defendants’
Response to the Order to Show Cause March
14th, 2008 - Minute Order to
Show Cause March
7th, 2008 - Defendants’ Reply
in Support of their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint February
19th, 2008 - Plaintiff’s
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss January
22nd, 2008 - Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Venue January
2nd, 2007 - Certificate Required
by LCVR 7.1 of the Local Rules January
2nd, 2007 - Joint Stipulation & Proposed
Order Re Service of Process & Scheduling December
19th, 2007 - Complaint “[…] It appears from a review of the record that
this case presents certain legal issues essentially identical to those
presented in four additional civil matters also pending in this division,
namely 1:09cv616, 1:09cv617, 1:09cv618 and 1:09cv645. It also appears that
all of the plaintiffs in these five related matters are represented by the
same counsel, as are all of the defendants. “Accordingly, for the reasons stated from the Bench,
and for purposes of judicial economy, It is hereby ordered that civil actions
1:09cv616, 1:09cv617, 1:09cv618 and 1:09cv645, which actions are currently
assigned to other judges in this division, are reassigned to the undersigned
district judge for the limited purpose of discovery and pre-trial motions. “It is further ordered that this matter is
consolidated with 1:09cv616, 1:09cv617, 1:09cv618 and 1:09cv645 for all
pretrial purposes, including discovery and dispositive motions. Whether the
matters will ultimately require separate trials to be presided over by the
originally assigned judges is a question that will be addressed at a later
date. […] “It is further ordered that defendants’ motion to
stay discovery […] is granted and discovery in each of these five
consolidated civil actions is accordingly stayed pending resolution of the motions
to dismiss filed by defendants in these matters. “It is further ordered that a hearing on all motions
to dismiss filed by defendants in these five consolidated civil actions is
scheduled for 2:00 p.m., Friday, August 28, 2009. […]” July 13th, 2009 - Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint “[…]
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), 17(b)(3),
and 21, Defendants hereby move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Dismissal is
required for the following reasons: (1) Plaintiffs fail to state a claim
under the Alien Tort Statute (28 U.S.C. § 1350) and without this claim there
is no basis for federal jurisdiction; (2) the Complaint presents
nonjusticiable political questions; (3) Plaintiffs fail to state a claim
under applicable Iraqi law; (4) Plaintiffs’ claims must be dismissed under
the government contractor defense; (5) Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by
absolute immunity; (6) Plaintiffs have not established capacity to sue; (7)
Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim against certain Defendants; and (8)
Plaintiffs have sued a non-legal entity. “The
grounds for Defendants’ Motion are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum
of Law. […]” June 12th, 2009 - Order Granting Enlargement of
Time for Defendants to Answer Complaint “[…] This matter having come before the Court on the
Joint Motion of the parties for an enlargement of time, until and including
July 13, 2009, within which Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint, and good cause being shown therefor, it is hereby ordered that the
motion is granted; and it is further ordered that Defendants shall file an
answer or other response to the Complaint on or before July 13, 2009. “So ordered. […]” June 11th, 2009 - Defendants’ Financial Interest Disclosure Statement “[…] Accordingly, the representations below are made
on behalf of Prince Group LLC; Xe Services LLC; Greystone LTD; Total
Intelligence Solutions LLC; U.S. Training Center, Inc.; GSD Manufacturing
LLC; Blackwater Security Consulting LLC; and Raven Development Group LLC
(collectively, ‘Defendants’). “2. Defendants have no parents, subsidiaries, or
affiliated entities (corporate or otherwise) that have issued stock or debt
securities to the public, nor are there any publicly entities (corporate or
otherwise) that own 10% or more of the stock in any of the Defendants. “3. None of the Defendants are partnerships, general
or limited. The following [are] the owners or members of a Defendant,
excluding other Defendants, that are non-publicly traded entities such as
LLCs or other closely held entities: Samarus CO LTD. […]” “[…] 17. On September 9, 2007, Blackwater shooters,
whose identities are known to Defendants and are capable of being ascertained
through discovery, used excessive force without justification and killed
Plaintiffs in and around Al Watahba Square, Baghdad. “18. The September 9, 2007, massacre was not an
isolated instance of misconduct by Xe-Blackwater. Xe-Blackwater has a pattern
and practice of recklessness in the use of deadly force. Xe-Blackwater has
created and fostered a corporate culture in which excessive and unnecessary
use of deadly force by its employees is not investigated or punished in any
way. “19. Xe-Blackwater routinely sends heavily-armed
‘shooters’ into the streets of Baghdad with the knowledge that some of those
‘shooters’ are chemically influenced by steroids and other judgment-altering
substances. “20. Through their acts and omissions, Xe-Blackwater
management encouraged shooting innocent Iraqis. Xe-Blackwater management
refused to fire or discipline ‘shooters’ who murdered innocent Iraqis.
‘Shooters’ known to have committed ‘bad shoots’ (i.e. murder) would not even
be placed on the ‘do not use’ list. Instead, Xe-Blackwater would continue to
rehire and deploy ‘shooters’ known to have killed innocents for no reason. “21. Xe-Blackwater captured much of the illegal
conduct on videotape and audiotape. At times, Xe-Blackwater would even review
the illegal conduct in a review called a ‘hot wash.’ Xe-Blackwater, however,
did not report or punish the illegal conduct of its mercenaries. Instead,
Xe-Blackwater intentionally destroyed the evidence of illegal conduct, and
encouraged the mercenaries to do the same. […]” Case consolidated pursuant to order filed on
3/28/08. All filings are to made in the lead case No. 07-CV-1831. March 28th, 2008 - Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend “[…] Plaintiff hereby moves the Court pursuant to
Rules 15(a), 20 and 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for leave to amend his
complaint. As set forth in the accompanying memorandum of points and
authorities, the proposed First Amended Complaint adds the Estate of Kadhum
Kayiz Aziz. Mr. Aziz was shot and killed by Blackwater during the September
9, 2007, massacre. […]” March 28th,
2008 - Minute Order Based upon the response of the parties to the
Court’s minute order to show cause entered on March 14, 2008, and in
accordance with a minute order entered this same date in Atban v. Blackwater
USA, Civil Action No. 07-1831 (RBW) (D.D.C.), it is ordered that this case is
consolidated with Atban v. Blackwater USA, Civil Action No. 07-1831 (RBW)
(D.D.C.), for purposes of pre-trial discovery and briefing. It is further
ordered that future filings in these consolidated cases shall be made in the
first instance in Atban v. Blackwater USA, Civil Action No. 07-1831 (RBW)
(D.D.C.), and “spread” to this docket by the parties using the Court’s Case
Management/Electronic Case Filing system once consolidation has been
effectuated by the Clerk of the Court. It is further ordered that this case
is administratively closed unless and until the case proceeds to trial, at
which time the case shall be re-opened. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on
3/28/08. March 21st, 2008 - Defendants’ Response to the Order to Show Cause “[…] The Court entered an order on March 14, 2008,
instructing the parties to show cause why this case should not be
consolidated with Abtan et al. v. Blackwater Worldwide et al., Case No.
1:07-cv-01831, also pending before the Court. Defendants do not oppose
consolidation of this case with the Abtan case for purposes of pretrial
discovery and proceedings. Defendants do, however, oppose consolidation for
purposes of trial. […]” March 14th, 2008 - Minute Order to Show
Cause In the interests of judicial economy, it is ordered that
on or before March 21, 2008, the parties shall show cause, if any they wish
to assert, why the Court should not consolidate this case with Atban v.
Blackwater USA, Civil Action No. 07-1831 (RBW) (D.D.C.). Signed by Judge
Reggie B. Walton on 3/14/08. March 7th, 2008 - Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss the Amended
Complaint “[…] Plaintiffs’ opposition brief offers invective,
unsupported accusations, and hyperbole instead of legal argumentation. We
will not burden the Court with detailed responses to Plaintiffs’ ad hominern
attacks. Those attacks - which mirror the repeated public statements by
Plaintiffs’ counsel - are irrelevant to the legal issue presented by the venue
motion before this Court. “Plaintiffs’ attempt to divert this Court's
attention away from the relevant legal issue is understandable, however,
given the lack of support for their effort to establish venue in this
District. Defendants showed in their opening brief, Docket No. 9 (‘Defs.
Br.’), that the Amended Complaint failed to establish any basis for venue in
this Court. […]” February 19th, 2008 - Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss “[…] This is an action alleging that Erik Prince and
his Blackwater companies are lawless mercenaries who have obtained federal
government business under the false pretense of operating lawful enterprises.
This is an action alleging that Erik Prince and his Blackwater companies
wrongfully procured a contract and earned more than one billion dollars from
the United States Department of State by making misrepresentations in this
District. This is an action alleging that Erik Prince and his Blackwater
companies wrongfully permitted ‘shooters’ known to be on steroids to
repeatedly and routinely use excessive force against Iraqis. This is an
action alleging that Erik Prince and his Blackwater companies are
affirmatively misleading Congress about the extent of their consistent and
excessive use of force. “The District of Columbia, as the seat of the
federal government (including the Department of State), is the place where a
substantial number of acts and omissions critical to Plaintiffs’ claims
occurred. Indeed, but for acts and omissions by Prince and the Blackwater
companies in the District of Columbia, the innocents who lost their lives in
Al Watahba Square on September 9 would be alive today. […]” January 22nd, 2008 - Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Venue “[…] Defendants Blackwater Worldwide; Blackwater
USA; Blackwater Lodge and Training Center, Inc.; Blackwater Security
Consulting, LLC; Blackwater Armor and Targets, LLC; Blackwater Airships, LLC;
Blackwater Logistics, LLC; Blackwater Canine; Raven Development Group, LLC;
Greystone Limited; Total Intelligence Solutions, LLC; Prince Group LLC; EP
Investments, LLC; and Erik Prince (collectively, ‘Defendants’), pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) move for dismissal of
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for lack of venue or, in the alternative, for
the transfer of this action to the Eastern District of Virginia. Defendants
also move for dismissal of three named non-legal entities-Blackwater
Worldwide, Blackwater USA, and Blackwater Canine-for lack of personal
jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2); for lack of capacity to
be sued, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b); and for misjoinder of Parties,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 . “As required by Local Rule 7(a), the reasons
supporting this motion are set forth in the attached Defendants’ Memorandum
in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Lack of Venue
and to Dismiss Non-Legal Entities. A Proposed Order is also attached as
required by Local Rule 7(c). Defendants have served counsel for Plaintiffs
with copies of this Motion, the Memorandum and its supporting documents, and
the Proposed Order. […]” January 2nd,
2007 - Certificate Required by LCVR 7.1 of the Local Rules “[…] I, the undersigned, counsel of record for the
Defendants,1 certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that there are
no parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates of any of the Defendants
which have any outstanding securities in the hands of the public. These
representations are made in order that judges of this Court may determine the
need for recusal. […]” January 2nd,
2007 - Joint Stipulation & Proposed Order Re Service of Process &
Scheduling “[…] The parties hereby agree and stipulate to the
following: 1. Defendants agree to accept service and waive any and all service
defects without any further process or request for waiver necessary on
Plaintiffs’ part. 2. Defendants shall answer or otherwise move in response to
the amended complaint by January 22, 2008. 3. Plaintiffs shall file a
responsive pleading by February 19, 2008. 4. Defendants shall file a reply,
if any, by March 7, 2008. The parties request that this Court adopt the
proposed order attached hereto. […]” December 19th, 2007 - Complaint “[…] 2. On September 9, 2007, heavily-armed
Blackwater mercenaries (known in Blackwater parlance as ‘shooters’) working
in Iraq fired, without justification, on a crowd of innocent Iraqi civilians
in and around Al Watahba Square resulting in multiple deaths and injuries.
Plaintiff Ali Hussamaldeen Ibrahim Albazzaz was among those killed in this
massacre. This senseless slaughter on September 9, 2007, was only one in a
series of recent incidents in Blackwater’s lengthy pattern of egregious
misconduct in Iraq resulting in the deaths of innocent Iraqis. “3. Blackwater created and fostered a culture of
lawlessness amongst its employees, encouraging them to act in the company’s
financial interests at the expense of innocent human life. This action seeks
compensatory damages to compensate the family of Mr. Albazzaz, who was gunned
down and killed by Blackwater shooters. This action seeks punitive damages in
an amount sufficient to punish Erik Prince and his Blackwater companies for
their repeated callous killing of innocents. […] “4. Plaintiff is the Estate of Ali Hussamaldeen
Ibrahim Albazzaz. Mr. Albazzaz was a resident of Baghdad until he was shot to
death by Blackwater shooters on September 9, 2007. He was the father of a
newborn baby daughter. […] “18. On or about September 9, 2007, Blackwater
shooters shot, without justification, and killed five innocent civilians,
including Ali Hussamaldeen Ibrahim Albazzaz, in and around Al Watahba Square.
Mr. Albazzaz was standing outside his rug store near Al Watahba Square when
he was gunned down by Blackwater shooters. Numerous other innocent civilians
were killed and injured in the incident. “19. Blackwater is responsible for the reckless
actions of its heavily-armed shooters acting in Iraq. The identities of the
Blackwater shooters who killed and injured innocent persons on September 9,
2007, are known to Blackwater and able to be discovered in this litigation.
[…]” |
|
Back
to the Blackwater Killings Back to
Second Gulf War/Iraq Invasion II |