|
The
War Profiteers - War Crimes, Kidnappings, Torture and Big Money |
|
The CIA in Europe - Kidnappings and
Secret Detentions |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Newest media report: Rendition Flights Promise
Welcomed (3/11/2008/Irish Times) Newest government/NGO report: “Dear Mr.
Tyrie, …” (2/9/2008/U.K. Foreign & Commonwealth Office) |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
“The CIA has been hiding and interrogating some of
its most important al Qaeda captives at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe,
according to U.S. and foreign officials familiar with the arrangement. “The secret facility is part of a covert prison
system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times has
included sites in eight countries, including Thailand, Afghanistan and
several democracies in Eastern Europe, as well as a small center at the
Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba, according to current and former intelligence
officials and diplomats from three continents. […]” Excerpt
of a Washington Post article
from November 2nd, 2005. |
CIA plane takes off |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
November 3rd, 2008 - Rendition Flights Promise
Welcomed 1 news
article by Irish Times September 29th, 2008 - Crashed Jet Carrying
Cocaine Linked to CIA 1 news
article by Atlantic Free Press September 5th, 2008 - Polish Prosecutors Probe
Possible CIA Jail 1 news
article by Reuters September 4th, 2008 - Mexico Drug Plane Used
for US ‘Rendition’ Flights: Report 2 news
articles by Agence France Presse & CounterPunch August 3rd, 2008 - US ‘Held Suspects on
British Territory in 2006’ 1 news article by
the Observer July 28th, 2008 - Lawyer Asks Taoiseach for
Information on CIA Flights 1 news article by
Irish Times July 20th, 2008 - MPs Say Cannot Rely on U.S.
Torture Assurances 1 news article by
Reuters July 8th, 2008 - Scandal at Diego Garcia 1 feature article
by Counterpunch July 5th, 2008 - UK Lawmakers to Launch New
Rendition Probe 1 news article by
the Associated Press July 3rd, 2008 - US: Only 2 Rendition
Flights Landed on UK Soil 1 news article by
the Associated Press June 24th, 2008 - European Role in Secret
US Flights Criticised 1 news article by
Financial Times June 22nd, 2008 - Inside a 9/11
Mastermind’s Interrogation 1 news article by
the New York Times June 2nd, 2008 - US Accused of Holding
Terror Suspects on Prison Ships 1 news article by
the Guardian May 25th, 2008 - Secret CIA Flights Raise
Political Storm in Portugal 1 news article by
Periódico 26 May 8th, 2008 - CIA Flights Haunt Romania 1 news article by
the Inter Press Service May 6th, 2008 - Guantánamo Briton Sues UK
over ‘Torture Evidence’ 2 news articles by
the Guardian & Reuters May 5th, 2008 - Renditions Ruin the EU
Case 1 news article by
Inter Press Service April 24th, 2008 - CIA Foresaw
Interrogation Issues 1 news
article by the Washington Post April 8th, 2008 - CIA Rendered 14 Prisoners
to Jordan: Report 1 news
article by Agence France Presse April 3rd, 2008 - British Rights Group
Hands Portugal Findings about Secret CIA Flights in its Airspace 1 news
article by the Associated Press March 13th, 2008 - Four Suspect CIA Flights
Refuel at Airport 1 news
article by the Limerick Reader March 12th, 2008 - CIA Boeing Sighted in CEE 1 news
article by Budapest Times March 10th, 2008 - Fresh Questions on Torture
Flights Spark Demands for Inquiry 1 news
article by the Guardian February 22nd, 2008 - Embarrassed Miliband Admits
Two US Rendition Flights on British Soil 2 news
articles by the Guardian & Associated Press December 11th, 2007 - Irish Human Rights Body Wants
CIA Flight Inspections 1 news article by
Agence France Presse September 8th, 2007 - CIA Chief Defends Detention
of Prisoners 1 news article by
the Associated Press June 8th, 2007 - European Report Addresses
CIA Sites 2 news
articles by Washington Post & the New York Times April 20th, 2007 - A CIA Man Speaks His Mind
on Secret Abductions 1 news article by
Congressional Quarterly March 7th, 2007 - Soviet-Era Compound in
Northern Poland was Site of Secret CIA Interrogation 1 news article by
Raw Story December 28th, 2006 - Hunt for CIA ‘Black Site’
in Poland 1 news article by
BBC News November 28th, 2006 - Europeans Accused of
Obstructing CIA Prison Probe 1 news article by
Reuters September 7th, 2006 - President Moves 14 Held in
Secret to Guantánamo 3 news articles by
the New York Times, Washington Post & Reuters June 12th, 2006 - EU Lawmakers Back Report on
CIA Terror Kidnappings 2 news articles by
Reuters and Sofia News Agency November 2nd, 2005 - CIA Holds Terror Suspects
in Secret Prisons 1 news article by
the Washington Post |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
September 2nd, 2008 - “Dear Mr. Tyrie, …” Letter by James
Hooley, UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office “[…] Thank you for your request for information, which we received on
23 May. I wrote to you on 23 June, 21 July and again on 18 August informing
you that we had not yet reached a decision on where the public interest lay
in respect of qualified exemptions engaged on your request and that this
would take some further time. “Having considered the public interest in relation to your request, we
are now in a position to provide you with a full response without exemptions.
I will address the points from your letter in turn. “On request number 1 in your letter, I can confirm that the UK
Government has sought information from the US Government in respect of the
two flights through Diego Garcia in 2002, in which a US plane with a single
detainee on board refuelled at the US facility on the island. The flight you
ask about specifically in your letter (which may not be one of these two) was
included on the list of flights that was passed to US officials on 15 May,
based upon which we sought their specific assurance that none of the flights
had been used for the rendition of an individual. The US confirmed that, with
the exception of the two cases related to Diego Garcia in 2002, there have
been no other instances in which US intelligence flights landed in the United
Kingdom, our Overseas Territories, or the Crown Dependencies, with a detainee
on board since 11 September 2001. […]” July 15th, 2008 - CIA-Kidnappings: Document
Request for EU/US Correspondence & Reports July 9th, 2008 - Human Rights Annual
Report 2007 Report by the U.K.
House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee “[…] 43. We have followed the issue of US Government policy and the
use of extraordinary rendition closely in recent years, as part of our annual
human rights reports, our discontinued series into the Foreign Policy Aspects
of the War against Terrorism and as part of our recent report into Overseas
Territories. This latter report sets out the Government’s repeated acceptance
in recent years of US assurances that UK territory had not been used for the
purposes of rendition since 1998. We then noted: “‘On 21 February 2008, the current Foreign Secretary, Rt Hon David
Miliband MP, reported to the House that the US had now informed him, contrary
to its previous assurances, that on two occasions in 2002 Diego Garcia had
been used for renditions flights. In both cases a US plane ‘with a single
detainee refuelled at the US facility’ on the island. Neither detainee was a
British national or British resident. One was currently in Guantánamo Bay and
the other had been released.’ “In the human rights report, the FCO expresses ‘concern and
disappointment’ that UK territory was used for the purposes of rendition
without the permission of the Government. In our report, we deplored the fact
that US assurances ‘have turned out to be false’. […] “47. We conclude that the Government has a moral and legal obligation
to ensure that flights that enter UK airspace or land at UK airports are not
part of the ‘rendition circuit’, even if they do not have a detainee on board
during the time they are in UK territory. We recommend that the Government
should immediately raise questions about such flights with the US authorities
in order to ascertain the full scale of the rendition problem, and inform the
Committee of the replies it receives in its response to this Report. […]” June 26th, 2008 - Zypries: Renditions
sind rechtsstaatswidrig Report
by the German Parliament/Deutscher Bundestag (in German) “[…] Als ‘willkürliche Freiheitsberaubung’ und damit als Verstoß gegen
rechtsstaatliche Standards hat Justizministerin Brigitte Zypries (SPD) die
Renditions-Praxis der USA kritisiert. Renditions wird die Entführung Terrorverdächtiger
und deren Transport in getarnten Flügen zu Geheimgefängnissen genannt,
gemeinhin wird von CIA-Flügen gesprochen. Zum Auftakt ihrer Vernehmung vor
dem Untersuchungsausschuss erklärte die SPD-Politikerin am
Donnerstagnachmittag, auch beim Kampf gegen den Terrorismus dürften die
Prinzipien von Demokratie und Rechtsstaat nicht aufgegeben werden. “Diesen Grundsatz habe sie bereits 2003 in Washington mehrfach
öffentlich und bei Gesprächen mit der Regierung betont. Bei der Frage, mit
welchen Methoden man auf terroristische Bedrohungen reagieren solle, herrsche
zwischen Deutschland und den USA nicht immer Übereinstimmung, so die Zeugin.
Zypries sagte, bis Mai 2006 hätten neben Medienberichten keine sicheren
Kenntnisse über die Nutzung deutschen Luftraums für Renditions vorgelegen.
[…]” June 19th, 2008 - Steinmeier weist
Mitverantwortung für geheime CIA-Flüge zurück Report
by the German Parliament/Deutscher Bundestag (in German) “[…] Man müsse ‘die Tatsachen schon sehr verdrehen’, um eine Mitschuld
der deutschen Regierung an der ‘Renditions’-Praxis der CIA zu konstruieren,
unter der die Entführung Terrorverdächtiger verstanden wird, die zu
Geheimgefängnissen geflogen und dort möglicherweise misshandelt oder
gefoltert wurden. Dies erklärte Außenminister Frank-Walter Steinmeier am
Donnerstagnachmittag zum Auftakt seiner Vernehmung vor dem
Untersuchungsausschuss. Der unter Kanzler Gerhard Schröder als Chef der
Regierungszentrale amtierende SPD-Politiker sagte, er sei erst zum
Jahresbeginn 2005 durch Berichte in US-Medien auf die Renditions aufmerksam
geworden. Als Außenminister habe er Ende November gegenüber der US-Regierung
rasch deutlich gemacht, dass diese Methoden ‘nach deutschem Recht nicht
akzeptabel’ seien. Beim Kampf gegen den Terrorismus müssten rechtsstaatliche
Standards beachtet werden. […]” June 5th, 2008 - Uhrlau: Kanzleramt
über Misshandlung Khafagys nicht informiert Report
by the German Parliament/Deutscher Bundestag (in German) “[…] Die Leitung des Kanzleramts sei nicht über die
rechtsstaatswidrigen Haftbedingungen des Ende September 2001 von US-Militärs
in Sarajewo verhafteten Deutsch-Ägypters Abdel Halim Khafagy unterrichtet
gewesen: Dies erklärte am Donnerstagnachmittag Ernst Uhrlau, damals
Geheimdienstkoordinator in der Regierungszentrale, zum Auftakt seiner
Vernehmung vor dem Untersuchungsausschuss. “Laut dem heutigen BND-Präsidenten wurde in den vom seinerzeitigen
Kanzleramtschef Frank-Walter Steinmeier geleiteten Sicherheitslagen von der
Spitze des Bundeskriminalamts (BKA) auch nicht zur Sprache gebracht, dass es
wegen der inakzeptablen Umstände der Gefangenschaft im US-Lager Eagle Base in
Tuzla zwei nach Bosnien entsandte BKA-Beamte abgelehnt hatten, den in München
ansässigen 69-Jährigen zu befragen. Schon im Oktober 2001 über die
Haftbedingungen Khafagys informiert gewesen zu sein, ‘schließe ich aus’, so
der Zeuge. Er habe damals auch nicht die schweren Verletzungen vermuten
können, die der Ägypter bei seiner Verhaftung erlitt. Uhrlau sagte, erst im
Herbst 2006 im Zuge der Recherchen des Untersuchungsausschusses von diesen
Vorkommnissen Kenntnis erhalten zu haben. “Khafagy war irrtümlich unter Terrorverdacht geraten und in Bosnien
Misshandlungen ausgesetzt, unter anderem fanden sich Blutspuren an seinen
Unterlagen. Er wurde nach Kairo ausgeliefert und konnte dann nach München
zurückkehren. […]” May 30th, 2008 - “Unfroh überrascht”
über Misshandlung Khafagys Report
by the German Parliament/Deutscher Bundestag (in German) “[…] Die Verhaftung des Deutsch-Ägypters Abdel Halim Khafagy Ende
September 2001 in Sarajewo (Bosnien-Herzegowina) durch US-Militärs war nach
Angaben Konrad Wenckebachs in der Zeit danach Thema im Kanzleramt. Am
Donnerstagabend erklärte der damalige Stellvertreter des seinerzeitigen
Geheimdienst-Koordinators Ernst Uhrlau vor dem Untersuchungsausschuss, laut
Aktenvermerken sei der Fall Khafagy auch in der mit Sicherheitsfragen
befassten Staatssekretärsrunde unter Leitung des ehemaligen Kanzleramtschefs
Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD) erörtert worden. Er wisse aber nicht, so der
Zeuge, ob dabei auch die Misshandlungen zur Sprache gekommen seien, denen der
seit langem in München lebende Ägypter ausgesetzt gewesen sei. Khafagy war
offenbar irrtümlich unter Terrorverdacht geraten und im US-Camp ‘Eagle Base’
in Tuzla (Bosnien-Herzegowina) inhaftiert worden, bevor er über Ägypten nach
Deutschland zurückkehren konnte. “Wenckebach berichtete vor den Abgeordneten, er sei einige Wochen nach
der Verhaftungsaktion in Sarajewo vom Leiter der Abteilung internationaler
Terrorismus unterrichtet worden, dass es wegen der rechtsstaatswidrigen
Umstände der Festnahme und der Inhaftierung Khafagys zwei nach Bosnien
entsandte Mitarbeiter des Bundeskriminalamts (BKA) abgelehnt hätten, den
Gefangenen zu befragen. Von Details wie etwa blutverschmierten Unterlagen
Khafagys, die den BKA-Vertretern von US-Seite übergeben wurden, habe er
nichts erfahren. […]” May 8th, 2008 - Kanzleramt war über
den Fall Khafagy informiert Report
by the German Parliament/Deutscher Bundestag (in German) “[…] Über ‘Indizien für Menschenrechtsverletzungen’ seitens der
US-Militärs in Bosnien gegenüber dem Ende September in Sarajewo verhafteten
Deutsch-Ägypter Abdel Halim Khafagy wurde im Oktober 2001 eine
Sicherheitsrunde im Kanzleramt in einem vom Bundeskriminalamt (BKA)
erstellten ‘Sprechzettel’ unterrichtet: Dies erklärte am Donnerstag vor dem
Untersuchungsausschuss Manfred Klink. “Der ehemalige Leiter der nach den New Yorker Attentaten vom 11.
September 2001 gebildeten BKA-Sonderermittlungsgruppe bestätigte damit
Angaben des Zeugen Thomas Port. Dieser BKA-Beamte hatte es zusammen mit
seinem Kollegen Klaus Zorn wegen der mit ‘deutschen Rechtsnormen nicht
vereinbaren Umstände’ zur Inhaftierung des damals 69jährigen Anfang Oktober
2001 abgelehnt, den seit vielen Jahren in München lebenden und offenbar
irrtümlich unter Terrorverdacht geratenen Verleger im US-Camp ‘Eagle Base’ in
Tuzla zu befragen. Laut Port wurden die BKA-Zentrale, das Innenministerium,
das Kanzleramt und der deutsche Botschafter in Sarajewo in schriftlichen und
mündlichen Berichten über die ‘irritierende Situation’ in Tuzla informiert.
Zorn sollte am Spätnachmittag als Zeuge aussagen. […]” April 2008 - Double Jeopardy/CIA
Renditions to Jordan 1 report by Human
Rights Watch
“[…] From 2001 until at least 2004, Jordan’s General Intelligence
Department (GID) served as a proxy jailer for the US Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA), holding prisoners that the CIA apparently wanted kept out of circulation,
and later handing some of them back to the CIA. More than just warehousing
these men, the GID interrogated them using methods that were even more brutal
than those in which the CIA has been implicated to date. The prisoners were
typically held for several months in GID custody - and in at least one case,
for nearly two years. “While the exact number of transfers cannot be ascertained, Human
Rights Watch has found that at least 14 non-Jordanian prisoners were sent
from United States to Jordanian custody during this three-year period, and
the actual figure may be much higher. While a few other countries have
received individuals rendered by the United States in recent years (that is,
transferred without formal legal process), no country is known to have
detained as many as Jordan. “Human Rights Watch has credible information indicating that the
prisoners included at least five Yemenis, three Algerians, two Saudis, a
Mauritanian, a Syrian, a Tunisian, and one or more Chechens. They may also
have included a Libyan, an Iraqi Kurd, a Kuwaiti, one or more Egyptians, and
a national of the United Arab Emirates. The majority of the men whom the US
brought to Jordan were initially arrested in either of two places: in
Pakistan, particularly the city of Karachi, and in Georgia, from the Pankisi
Gorge. One reportedly said that he was held for three months at a US prison
in Iraq before being moved to Jordan, while many others were later held in
secret CIA detention in Kabul or at the US military base at Bagram, in
Afghanistan. […]” October 16th, 2007 - “Dear President
Pöttering …” Document by the
Council of the European Union October 8th, 2007 - Report on the
Legislators’ Dialogue 63rd EP/US Congress Meeting Report by the
Delegation for Relations with the US of the European Parliament “Meeting With Secretary Michael Chertoff […] - Secretary Chertoff also
answered questions about Data Protection (PNR, SWIFT) and the need to find
convergence on ‘basic principles’, also in view of review procedures and the
conclusion of final agreements, the level of controls on private aircraft
(including CIA rendition flights), the nature of imminent security threats in
both the US and Europe: he identified ‘local plots by small groups of
home-grown terrorists’ as the most dangerous threat, and as the major
challenge for internal security forces, effectiveness depended on adequate
technology and ‘critical infrastructure’; at the same time, democratic
accountability was of importance. “The Chairman, Mr Jonathan Evans thanked Secretary Chertoff and
stressed the importance of continuing the close relationship established between
the Secretary and the European Parliament. […]” June 7th, 2007 - Secret detentions and
illegal transfers involving Council of Europe member states Report by the
Committee on Legal Affairs & Human Rights, Council of Europe January 30th, 2007 - Report on the
transportation and illegal detention of prisoners by the CIA Final
Report by the Temporary Committee of the European Parliament “[…] Motion for a European Parliament Resolution on
the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and
illegal detention of prisoners […] “L. whereas the Temporary Committee has obtained,
from a confidential source, records of the informal transatlantic meeting of
European Union (EU) and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) foreign
ministers, including US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, of 7 December
2005, confirming that Member States had knowledge of the programme of
extraordinary rendition, while all official interlocutors of the Temporary
Committee provided inaccurate information on this matter, “M. whereas the Temporary Committee has obtained,
from a confidential source, records of meetings of the Council’s Working
Party on Public International Law (COJUR) and Transatlantic Relations Working
Party (COTRA) with senior representatives of the US Department of State
during the first half of 2006 (notably on 8 February and 3 May 2006), while
it was provided by the Council Presidency only with a summarised version of
these documents; whereas the documents sent by the Council to Parliament
concerning those meetings in answer to Parliament's specific request, were
incomplete summaries of the proceedings with essential parts missing, […] “25. Is outraged by the proposal which was to have
been made by the then Council Presidency to set-up a joint ‘framework’ with
the US on standards for the rendition of terrorism suspects, as confirmed by
those who took part in the meeting of the Council’s Working Party on Public
International Law (COJUR) and the Transatlantic Relations Working Party
(COTRA) with senior representatives of the US Department of State held in
Brussels on 3 May 2006; […] “42. Stresses that at least 1 245 flights operated
by the CIA flew into European airspace or stopped over at European airports
between the end of 2001 and the end of 2005, to which should be added an
unspecified number of military flights for the same purpose; recalls that, on
one hand, there may have been more CIA flights than those confirmed by the
investigations carried out by the Temporary Committee, while, on the other
hand, not all those flights have been used for extraordinary rendition; […]” December 14th, 2006 - “Dear Mr. President,
…” Letter
by Javier Solana, Secretary General, Council of the European Union December 5th, 2006 - Report on the Legislators’
Dialogue 62nd EP/US Congress Meeting Report by the
Delegation for Relations with the US of the European Parliament “[…] With regard to international terrorism, the
European side underlined that the EU and US were the biggest allies in this
fight, but its root causes should be tackled. Furthermore, a difficult
balance had to be struck in maintinging human rights (including right to
privacy) whilst fighting against terrorism. The EU and the US should avoid
embarking on collision courses in this area. With regard to specific issues,
the CIA rendition flights, Passenger name records (PNR) and exchange of SWIFT
data were mentioned. “The Administration had admitted to CIA rendition
flights, but there had been no substantial discussion in Congress: for the
EP, the legality of abducting people was out of the question, and it had
instituted a special temporary committee on this subject. It was hoped that
the new majority in Congress would be helpful in clearing up this issue. “On privacy, it was remarked that US legislation
protected privacy of US citizens only; Congress and the EP ‘should sit down
together’ to discuss common data protection “The US side indicated that, of course, there could
not be a discussion ‘on the legality of torture’, but there was no doubt that
terrorists who want to harm Western civilisation and societies are very
active, as Europeans have seen when the London and Madrid bombings occurred.
There are States which support terrorism (such as Iran), and the EU should
make suggestions on the best way to stop terrorists as well as transfers of
nuclear material and of money used for financing their activities. Would the
EU support sanctions against Iran, and take the leadership on this issue? In
any case, terrorism would accompany us for a long time. “According to some views on the American side, in
the next Congress there would be ‘more accountability’ in this whole area.
[…]” November 27th, 2006 - Exchange of views with
Mr Petritsch, former High Representative Report by the
Council of the European Union “[…] Mr Petritsch opened with a brief remark
concerning the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina at the time of the events
regarding the so called Algerian Six (January 2002). […] “Several members wanted to know what action Mr
Petritsch had taken with regard to the Algerian Six, and if he had or could
have done anything to prevent their handing over to the US. Mr Petritsch
replied that the matter of the Algerian Six was a matter between the
government of Bosnia-Herzegovina and the US administration, and that the
international community was de facto and formally excluded from the event.
The matter clearly being a bilateral one between the US and
Bosnia-Herzegovina, he had not received any official or informal information
about it from the US before the handing over. What had happened could not
have been foreseen. According to the information he had received, there had
been no active participation from the International Police Task Force (ITPF)
in the handing over. Once the men were in Guantánamo Bay, his office had
worked for a clarification of the matter from the US, and asked the US
administration to correct the situation. The efforts of his office had
however not been successful. […] “Mr Petritsch explained that the question of
naturalised Mujahedin members who had fought on the Bosnian side during the
war, had been a matter of interest even before 9/11, but became a huge issue
after that date. At the time of the handing over of the six men, there was an
enormous pressure to deal with terrorism. The US enjoyed great sympathy in
Bosnia-Herzegovina, since they had stopped the war. Europeans on the other
hand were seen as doing very little. The massacre of Srebrenica had also
affected opinion on the political stance of Europe. While it might not have
been explicit, it was clear to every one involved that the US wanted to see
action with regard to terrorism-related issues. It was very clear that the
government had to deliver and international actors had to be extremely
cautious about what they said and did. […]” November 21st, 2008 - Document 15404/06 (Partially Accessible
to the Public) Report by the
Council of the European Union November 16th, 2006 - Exchange of views
with Mr Davis, Secretary General of the EC Report by the
Council of the European Union October 24th, 2006 - “Dear Josep, …” Letter
by Geoff Hoon, Minister for Europe, U.K. Foreign & Commonwealth Office October 11th, 2006 - Exchange of views on
the outcome of the mission of a delegation to Berlin Report by the
Council of the European Union July 6th, 2006 - Exchange of views with
Mr Marty, President of the EC Committee on Legal Affairs Report by the
Council of the European Union “[…] Mr Marty presented the conclusions of his
report, which was based inter alia on official information provided by
national and international air traffic control authorities and information
from sources inside the US intelligence services. According to Mr Marty,
there had been numerous violations of human rights in the fight against
terrorism. These violations had been made possible through active or passive
cooperation on the part of governments, either deliberately or through
negligence. A majority of the Council of Europe Member States' governments
had been passive in relation to CIA activities connected with renditions on
their territories. According to Mr Marty, it was indisputable that
individuals had been seized on the basis of mere suspicion and taken to
places where torture was commonly practiced. There had been no judicial
scrutiny or supervision regarding the foundation of those suspicions. He
considered that while some information was still missing, existing knowledge
of events was enough to draw the conclusions that he had drawn in his report. “With regard to the question of interception of bank
transfer data from the SWIFT system by the US secret services, Mr Marty said
that many European governments were aware of it and that it had taken place
without any legal basis or judicial supervision. While banking transactions
could give very important information about criminal activities, procedures
for monitoring the transactions existed, and these procedures must be
observed. […]” June 12th, 2006 - Report on the
transport and illegal detention of prisoners by the CIA Interim draft
report by the Temporary Committee of the European Parliament June 7th, 2006 - Alleged Secret
Detentions and Unlawful Inter-State Transfers Report by
Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe/Committee on Legal Affairs and
Human Rights May 3rd, 2006 - Document COREU CFSP/SEC/1126/06,
Classified Restreint UE Report
by the Council of the European Union April 30th, 2006 - Exchange of views with
Mr. Oleskey Report by the
Council of the European Union April 21st, 2006 - Report on the
Legislators’ Dialogue 61st EP/US Congress Meeting Report by the
Delegation for Relations with the US of the European Parliament “[…] The following discussion dealt with integration
policies, terrorism and international Human Rights issues. For the US
Delegation, it was important to realize that integration policies took place
in a ‘smaller world’, where world-wide instant communication magnified
reactions and ‘jumping to conclusions’. Also, there were ‘in-built bias’
affecting perceptions and assumptions: this was true, in particular, for
issues like immigration, or renditions. […] “With regard to terrorism, the key concept was that,
although terrorists constituted a ‘stateless faction’, they availed
themselves of a ‘concrete network’ which should be destroyed by means of a
‘war on terror’. Terrorists were not simple criminals, and while torture was
unacceptable, mass murders had to be prevented. The European press had often
misrepresented conditions in Guantanamo; also, the concept itself of
‘renditions’ was ‘amorphous’, and no concrete information was available on
this subject. “For the European side, the creation of the EU Human Rights Agency was a good symbol of the crucial value represented by Human Rights in the EU | |||||||
